What the Trend in Online Databases Means to the Employment Screening Industry

The most prominent trend in the employmentcause potential liability is because most databases
screening industry has been a proliferation of onlinecontain information that may not be used in the
databases offering cheap background checks. Anyscreening process such as arrest records, or
one can access the internet and with a quick searchunadjudicated matters, or matters for which an
be able to purchase, for example, criminal records forexpungement exists at the Court but is not reflected in
a low fee. While that is very appealing to companiesthe database.As previously stated, professional
looking to trim the budget on background checks, itbackground checks require an experienced researcher
may in fact be a dangerous trend.What do thewho knows what to look for including: verifying a
companies say that have been running backgroundapplicant's true identity, obtaining verification of past
checks, back when employment screening "industry"employment and education, fully investigating the
was just a concept and not an acceptedapplicant's criminal past (a skill that requires an intense,
practice?Tom Lawson, the founder of APSCREEN,and multi-level knowledge of court procedures, credit
the oldest screening firm in the country, says "Theevaluation including legal records such as bankruptcies,
necessity of a background check has beentax liens and judgments, driving analysis, as well as a
established now, and that's why we are seeing such ahistory of being a sex offender or involved in domestic
proliferation of people getting into the business -violence or retraining orders for stalking. All of the
particularly because the internet makes it an easy fieldfactors contribute to, but may not necessarily be
to enter because of the low start-up costs."Lawsongermane to the job description, at hand, and while
continues, "But back in 1980, when we practicallyexciting, could lead an employer into court, for using the
invented the concept of employment screening,information to deny candidacy, for inapplicability.By now
companies had to be convinced that there was ait should be fairly clear that professional background
good reason to spend money on background checks.checks are a comprehensive package that far
We have always been a business that focused onoutweigh any "bits and pieces" of information that can
training our specialists to screen applications forbe provided by any individual online database. When a
completeness, thoroughness and accuracy andperson is thinking about hiring someone and they
provide our customers with individualized service. Thisbelieve that "all I really need to do is run a fingerprint
trend of online databases is very disturbing to uscheck," they are really missing the point. So much more
because the potential for error and liability is veryinformation is needed to make a careful, informed hiring
high."The Dangers of Databases - Caveat Emptor ofdecision. Besides, only police departments run
the Quick TurnaroundDatabases are only as good asfingerprint checks, not employers.Liability Risks of Not
the search logic used to retrieve stored data, andPerforming Background ChecksIn today's hiring
search logic is expensive and only as good as theenvironment employers face ever increasing potential
amount of money the database companies are wilingfor liability from the workplace when they choose not
to invest in it. Unfortunately, the advent of the internetto do background checks on their news hires. Those
has made starting an online business easy for anyone.liabilities include:· Premises liability for not
As a result, many companies that start an internetsafeguarding customers from employees who steal, lie,
"data selling" business do so because the start-upcheat or injure· Negligent hiring liability in the event
costs are small which means the databases can onlyof violence or fiduciary malfeasance, for not providing
provide limited information.Even worse, most onlineother employees a safe place to work·
database providers lack an intimate workingTermination or investigation of the individual who hired
knowledge of how to screen potential applicants. Theiran applicant who later steals from the company or
focus is on selling units of information forexposes the company to the above-mentioned
profit.Database companies cannot simply useliabilities.· Litigation under officer/director liability
off-the-shelf software to retrieve publicly compiledtheories because of incompetent or inept hiring
repository information. It comes in too many proprietarypractices involving the company and/or person who
"operating systems' and while good, expensive searchhired the employeeTo prevent this type of litigation, a
logic helps to delineate between the differentcompany must have established a refined HR policy
languages of the information entered into the databasethat includes a professional employment screening
company's archival system, it can NEVER be 100%component.You must become knowledgeable about
"competent", even if it is a very "robust" retrievalemployment laws which a good background screener
architecture.By the sheer science of databasing, 100%can help you with. For example, did you know that it is
information retrieval capability is impossible, unless (asillegal to make a decision to not hire someone based
demonstrated recently by the IRS and FBI Computeron an arrest record alone? Usually, the only time it is
fiascos) the "source" data originates from whollylegal for a third-party provider to release arrest
compatible systems. This means that going in you caninformation is in the case of daycare providers and
never expect to have a complete file when younuclear facility workers. An employer, generally is not
compile data from different systems. This results inallowed to ask about arrests and cannot use this
"data drops" in which bytes of information mysteriouslyinformation to deny employmentCritical Tips For
disappear, as well as computer viruses which canChoosing an Employment ScreenerSo what should
reside undetected in mainframes for years andyou be looking for in an employment screening
indiscriminately wipe out data, which would becompany?First of all, look for longevity. The longer a
undecipherable in a foreign operating environment, suchcompany has been providing background checks, the
as a third party compiler.A classic example of thismore experienced it is, and as a result, the knowledge,
occurred on January 17, 1990, when screening clientthey will have in recognizing the signs of a "suspect"
District Cablevision received a now infamous incorrectapplicant. This is a field where screeners need not only
report of a felony cocaine conviction on one Jamesbe highly trained, but have extensive experience.Ask
Russell Wiggins, which was not verified for accuracyfor references and then call them. You want a
or its relationship to the subject Wiggins, and whichcompany with an extensive and positive track record
resulted in a serious elimination of candidacy lawsuitof providing factual information so you can make an
brought against the provider based upon slander. Thisinformed hiring decision.Look for the company's
error dealt a major blow to the reputation of theprofessional memberships in organizations such as
provider and resulted in the payment of a substantialASIS, SHRM, PIHRA, NPRRA, NAPBS, as well as
monetary settlement. (US District Court, District ofothers. This indicates a combined knowledge of the
Columbia; Civil Action 90-199; Wiggins (et al) v. Equifaxscreening and security industries.Do you as the hiring
Services, Inc. (et al).)Database companies outnumbercompany; have a complete knowledge of employment
legitimate employment screeners almost 75 to 1 in thelaw? If not, you need your screening company to
industry today. The main problem with such vendorsknow the laws involving background checks. If is
who advertise "nationwide criminal checks," "statewideextremely beneficial if you hire a company that has an
criminal checks," "instant", or "online," is the veracity ofacute knowledge of "negligent hiring" practices, much in
the data they are selling and the competency of thethe way that an Expert Witness would know.The
search used to retrieve the data.Many vendorscompany should have an intimate, thorough and
acquire data from a multitude of sources, not havinglong-term knowledge of the Fair and Accurate Credit
any idea who compiled the information in the firstTransactions Act (FACTA), and the Fair Credit
place. This data is then combined into each vendor'sReporting Act (FCRA), as well as Sarbanes-Oxley, the
own format, which often does not contain completeGramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and the myriad local statutes
information. The common term in the databasethat may or may not apply to the employment
industry is "data drops," which in addition to the aboveprocess. They should also have the ability to testify for
meaning also means that not all of the data, such asyou in a court of law if need be; or even better, keep
criminal record information from a court jurisdiction thatyou out of court in the first place!Does your
is put into the database, is available to be extracted,prospective screener have knowledge and
retrieved or researched. This occurs because of theunderstanding of current HR management systems?
following:1. The bridge software used to import theHow about corporate due diligence programs or
jurisdictional data into the database company'sfactual employment screening programs that train
memory banks can never be 100% reliable, as long aspeople to find fraudulent applications and false
the compiler is gathering information from "foreign"identities?Are you beginning to see how there is so
repositories2. The computer has to handle manymuch more to background checks than first meets the
different formats while compiling information into aeye?In short, can your vendor help keep you from
standardized format so that some of the data simplyunwanted litigation? Unless you or someone in your
does not transfer.This is a problem because of thecompany is an expert in employment law, you are
technical department's inability to inform the salesputting your company at significant risk by using an
marketing department properly as to the database'sonline database provider. If you are using any of the
limitations or unwillingness to tell the customer that themultitudes of online databases, it's not likely you are
product it is selling may be deficient in some areas. Asprotected.Not only do these online companies increase
a result, approximately 5 to 8% of the data is lost. Thatyour risk of exposure, they may even add to it. For
means that there is a 92% to 94% chance (at best) toexample, let's say you are currently using an
identify a record on a candidate. Also, data drops areemployment screener that does not require you to
indiscriminate. Rape convictions are dropped as easilyprovide a signed release for each applicant. Sounds
as traffic tickets.The second problem with databasesrelatively harmless, doesn't it?The truth is what these
is the psychological dependence they engender oncompanies have done is had you waive liability to them
those using them. As time progresses, the databases'when you signed up for an account so they can avoid
ease-of-use causes the user to forget just howthe time and effort it takes involved in this critical step.
important it is that the database be accurate andTheir focus in on increasing their sales; which isn't
complete, and that the need for thoroughness innecessarily in your company's best interest.In the case
screening an employment candidate should never vary,of a credit bureau audit, your company is now
as to ensure consistency in the screening process,responsible for producing an original signed application
thus precluding the successful prosecution of theand therefore also liable if you don't have one on file. A
employer for Title 7 claims. The results of falling intogood employment screener is not only a long-term
this pattern of laziness can be disastrous as litigationcertified credit bureau, they also provide signatures for
may not be far behind.Crucial Steps in the Employmentthese audits on a regular basis and you should never
Screening ProcessHistorically, and until the late 1970seven know when theses audits occur. A typical
when the "personnel" department recognized the needlawsuit of this nature could cost your company six
to get involved in employment screening, backgroundfigures. There is no upside for a company purchasing
checks were performed by security departments -background checks to take this kind of risk.What type
typically comprised of highly qualified, and often retiredof criminal conviction research, hand-researched or
professionals.Today it's up to the HR department toonline databases, does the company provide? Most
create the mandatory steps needed to develop acompanies do not realize that there is absolutely NO
thorough employment screening procedure including forsingle source of information available regarding criminal
starters, a positive candidate identification process. Ifconvictions. It doesn't exist - anywhere. Do they verify
this isn't the first step in the background check, thethese discoveries against subject identifiers and if so,
results of your searches could be faulty and thereforehow?Does your online provider claim to have worker's
prove useless.For example, critical identification datacompensation claim records? Any information provided
needs to be gleaned from credit bureaus and otherregarding worker's compensation claims potentially
repositories including unused maiden names, orprovides a false sense of security for the user. The
intentionally omitted information such as date of birthtruth is the only records available for worker's
and variations in social security numbers. This is wherecompensation are appeals, not claims, and much of the
the difference between true employment screenersavailable files are sealed because they are not as yet
and data sellers comes into play. It takes years ofadjudicated. This means the file competency rate for
experience to be able to differentiate, for example,this type of data is about 40% - not good
intentionally omitted information versus an honestenough.Does the employment screener have
mistake.The same holds true for incompleteinternational research capability? If not, how will they
disclosures such as partial criminal history in which thescreen people you might want to hire from overseas?
full story can dramatically change your assessment ofWithout the kinds of connections and a network of
the applicant. One such case involved an applicantrelationships developed over long periods of time, this
who disclosed to the company that she wasinformation would be almost impossible to get.Has the
convicted of trespassing. When the criminal checkcompany you want to hire ever been involved in a
came back, however, it was discovered that while shelitigation themselves for improper screening
had indeed told the truth that she was convinced ofprocesses? Can they provide you with at least three
trespassing, she had also been convicted of traffickinglong-term references? Do they have professional
in child pornography and possession of controlledliability insurance including errors and omissions? Are
substances - a serious error by omission.Hiringthey FACTA, FCRA; CCRRA, and G-L-B
decisions must not be made on partial, incomplete orcompliant?And of course you need to know the
incorrect data, but on thorough information and apractical things such as cost, turnaround time and
consistent application of thorough scrutiny of all of thereporting method. Many competent employment
information regarding criminal, credit, work andscreeners are listed in publications such as the Security
education history, driving attitude, whether or not theIndustry Buyers Guide as well as industry publications
candidate has completed the application completely, assuch as those connected with the Society of Human
well as identity disclosure.A screener must haveResource Management (SHRM) and the American
extensive knowledge about each vendor source toSociety for Industrial Security (ASIS).What is needed
make the appropriate follow-on decisions that developnow in this industry is a standardization of compliance
into a full and comprehensive report.Online databasesfor employment screeners and someone to step up
don't provide highly trained researchers who can spotand create an industry co-operative that can police
"red flags" and other indicators in an application thatit.Cathy Taylor is a marketing consultant with over 25
demand further consideration. You can only get thisyears experience. She specializes in internet marketing,
kind of service from an interactive screener who hasstrategy and plan development, as well as
years of experience in processing backgroundmanagement of communications and public relations
checks.Another reason online databases can beprograms for small business sectors.