The Honeymoon Is Over! 22 Million Workers Are Divorced From Their Jobs

There is a nationwide concern about America'sbefore they're hired and does not emphasize
"divorce rate," but they're not talking about matrimony.interaction after they're hired.Many businesses fail to
"The increasing number of American workers who arefocus on employee development, training and retention
divorced from their jobs and completely disengagedat any level, including managers. "Companies don't
from their work is shocking," says Eva Jenkins of VIPrealize how important it is to give their managers the
Innovations. "More than that, it's costing businesses atools and training they need to do their jobs, too," says
fortune in lost productivity and revenue."DismissingJenkins.Time Badly Spent
charges that 21st Century workers are slackers orSince they haven't received proper training, many
possess an un-business like sense of entitlement, themanagers themselves do not know what it takes to
blame squarely should be placed on the shoulders ofsucceed in a particular role nor do they have an
ineffectual human resources management andincentive to care. More often than not, the focus and
managers. Disengaged employees aren't born thatemphasis of the H/R department is "putting out
way. They're created by ineffective, badly trainedfires."For the average manager, the bulk of a workday
managers and lack of strong human resourceis spent working with employees who are negative,
management within corporations.Instead of matchingcompletely disengaged and should be terminated
the right employee to the right position for long-termbecause they shouldn't have been hired in the first
success, most companies and H/R departments putplace.Know When To Hold 'Em and Know When To
the emphasis on simply filling the position as quickly asFire 'Em
possible. As a result, American businesses are losingJenkins is quick to point out that "not all employees
money as fast as they're losing employees. Each staffcan, or should, be saved." She says that those who
turnover cuts into the bottom line.Gallup and Gallopingare actively disengaged may thrive on the negativity
Disinterestand refuse to become part of any solution, preferring
Jenkins is not the only employment professional ringingto perpetual problems.As workers increasingly rely on
the alarm bell. The statistics on workforceeach other to generate products and services, the
engagement are shocking. The Gallup Managementproblems and tensions that are fostered by actively
Journal's semi-annual Employee Engagement Indexdisengaged workers can cause great damage to an
reports that 54% of employees are not engaged, andorganization's functioning. "If an employee repeatedly
17% are actively disengaged at work and only 29%refuses opportunities to engage again, terminating their
are actively engaged.What does this mean toemployment should be seriously considered," says
American businesses?There are 22 million activelyJenkins.Last Resort
disengaged employees in America, according toTermination is often necessary in order to avoid
another Gallup statistic. Their dissatisfaction isfurther damage to staff morale and remove obstacles
manifested in employee absence, illness, and a varietyto organizational progress. The solution is a flawed one,
of other big and small problems that occur whenat best, since a tremendous amount of money is lost
people are unhappy at work.Unfortunately for theirevery time a new employee needs to be found, hired,
employers, when people are unhappy, they let youand trained.A more effective approach is the
know it in a million different ways. They createdevelopment of in-depth hiring processes that will result
problems with co-workers and customers alike, andin the right people being selected from the start. Once
can demoralize an entire operation.Ultimately,the right people are in place, managers need to work
disengaged employees can undermine a business andto keep employees interested and engaged so that
put it on the fast track to being out-of-business. It isthey're stay in place.Jenkins advises that all
therefore essential for managers and H/Rmanagement supervisory training programs include
professionals to refine their hiring process byEmployee Retention Workshops. "From my
expanding their methodology and using whole-personperspective, Employee Retention Training should be a
assessment tools.The Peter Principle Lives Onfull course within the MBA Leadership Programs," she
Jenkins says two key features characterize asays.Expectations, Clarification and Measurement
whole-person assessment. "A manager needs to lookTo grow and sustain employee engagement,
at whether the candidate is a good match for the jobmanagers must regularly provide expectations,
in terms of hard skills," she explains. "But it's alsoclarification, and measurement to employees. A good
important to make sure that it's a soft skills match,place to start is with conversations about expectations
too...that the candidate's interest and personal goalsfor every person in a given role.It's important that
and needs will be met by the work itself and they willmanagers strive to get each employee to view his or
fit into the corporate culture."Unless a company definesher role from a broader perspective instead of from a
success in a job, and in an organization, it cannot hire,narrow task-oriented point of view. Managers often
retain or grow their own workforce successfully.overlook the value of making an employee feel part of
Rather than being terminated themselves, badthe big picture and encouraging that person to see
managers are continually being promoted. Soon they'rehow his or her work contributes to the future success
victims of the Peter Principle.The Peter Principle is aof the company."The objective is to focus employees
theory put forth by Dr. Laurence J. Peter in 1969. Iton outcomes as well as the steps it takes to get
states that employees within a hierarchical organizationthere," explains Jenkins. The change of focus allows
advance to their highest level of competence, are thenemployees to become goal-oriented rather than
promoted to a level where they are incompetent, andtask-oriented and to enjoy a sense of achievement
then stay in that position because they no longer meritwhen goals are reached...and surpassed!"Getting to
advancement.With incompetent managers at the topKnow You
and in control of hiring practices, this scenario spellsFor great managers, the path toward engaging
disaster for staffing.$350 Billion Lostemployees and keeping them engaged begins with
The impact of employee disengagement is a bottomasking them what they want and what they need in
line issue. Gallup statistics show that unhappy workersorder to be effective in their roles. Good managers
cost the American business economy up to $350 billionneed to get to know their employees better than the
annually in lost productivity!"This is an urgent problememployees know themselves!To achieve this,
and businesses that don't address their own role in themanagement needs to define competencies for each
problem are doomed," says Jenkins. The problemjob, division and the company as a whole. A sound
affects both companies and disengagedhiring/selection process and finely honed assessment
employees.Many outstanding employees end upmethodology will provide the foundation.With the this
leaving an organization feeling lost and beaten down.type of hiring strategy, research shows that
After a bad work experience, it's hard for even thecompanies raise the odds by more than 75% that
most competent workers to re-define their ownmanagers will make the right hiring decisions. Instead of
purpose and rebuild their self-confidence. As a result,simply filling a position, they'll bring in qualified, productive,
outstanding workers become "stuck" and find theyengaged workers who feel they have a stake in the
have difficulty making a decision about their nextbusiness and its success.Give The People What They
position.The Honeymoon Is Over and Workers Are NoWant
Longer Married to Their JobsJenkins recommends that a business "assess,
Jenkins is clear that she feels "Bad management andmeasure, survey and train the entire organization" to
bad leadership create a destructive culture wherecreate a company-wide culture that "prioritizes
people will not thrive!" She points out that the vastemployee engagement at every level."There's one
majority of workers accept new positions withexpressed desire that frequently surprises managers
excitement and interest. "People are generally thrilled toand H/R people: many of the survey participants said
land a new position and are ready to give their all tothey wanted to be challenged by their jobs. "In other
success."Sadly, that enthusiasm quickly gives way towords, employees don't want to sleepwalk their way
apathy when employees feel they are in the wrongthrough the workday," says Jenkins. They want to
place at the wrong time. HR departments or hiringmatter...make a contribution...make a difference."And
managers don't take the time to match employees tothat," says Jenkins, "is the very definition of being
their positions on all levels - professional andengaged!"Jenkins is a leading authority on human
personal.Trickle Down Blamecapital management, and the driving force at VIP
Upper management is also to blame for the problem.Staffing and VIP Innovations in Washington, D.C. She is
Hiring managers know very little about their ownalso co-author of a book titled, "Conversations on
employees due to their own tremendous workload.Success", a collection of powerful interviews with
Additionally, today's corporate culture does notaccomplished entrepreneurs in a variety of industries.
encourage managers to get to know their employees