| In the past, many organizations have relied on generic | | | | for the staff. |
| personality profiling tools to assess, recruit and manage | | | | For example, if the majority of the sales agents learn |
| their employees. Though these tools have garnered a | | | | better through drawings and diagrams, a Sales Training |
| certain measure of success, there were many flaws | | | | program should avoid being too wordy, which may |
| that needed to be addressed for increased workplace | | | | confuse them in their learning process. |
| relevance. | | | | 3. Diversity of SMARTS, United as ONE. The success |
| In view of these concerns, First Quatermain has | | | | of a company's project management would require a |
| developed THREE tools and has blended them into an | | | | melting pot of a variety of intelligences. |
| integrated schema known as the Synergistic | | | | For example, the effectiveness of a marketing project |
| Organization of Unique People (S.O.U.P) Model. | | | | team will depend on the team's make-up of the |
| This integrated model has been developed holistically | | | | different kinds of SMARTS. A GREAT marketing |
| for application in a workplace context. The three tools | | | | team would usually comprise of members who are |
| are: | | | | People-Smart (knowing how potential customers will |
| | | | feel and response), Word-Smart (how to write catchy |
| 1. WorkACTIONS Map | | | | slogans and taglines to attract the attention of the |
| 2. WorkSMARTS Map | | | | potential customers) and Logic-Smart (the |
| 3. Nature of Effective Organization (NEO) Profile | | | | step-by-step process of executing the plan). |
| Brief Descriptions | | | | Nature of Effective Organization (NEO) Profile |
| WorkACTIONS Map: | | | | The Nature of Effective Organization (NEO) Profile |
| The WorkACTIONS Map was developed based on | | | | serves as a 360° Feedback Survey for senior |
| the premise that a human resource profile tool must: | | | | management to understand how their employees view |
| 1. Be Relevant in a Workplace Context. It was | | | | their organizations, the management and its operations. |
| discovered that there is a degree of dissimilarity in a | | | | Using similar profiling framework as WorkACTIONS |
| person's attitudes and behavior when at work, as | | | | Map, this organizational profiling tool provokes a |
| compared to outside the workplace. | | | | company to rethink the way they lead and manage |
| For example, an employee who is very passionate | | | | human resources. |
| about playing golf may not necessarily bring this | | | | To be more specific, there are various points of |
| passion and enthusiasm into his/her workplace. | | | | strategic reflections that would hasten senior |
| 2. Focus on the Line of ACTIONS rather than just | | | | management to use the Nature of Effective |
| Personalities. In most profiling tools, potential employees | | | | Organization (NEO) Profile as an information-gathering |
| are selected, based partly on the assessment of their | | | | tool. The following points of strategic reflections include: |
| suitable personalities. Though this can help increase the | | | | |
| success of recruiting suitable talents, it is still rather | | | | 1. High Turnover Rate. Many leaders and senior |
| myopic in nature. | | | | management of organizations tend to (or choose to) |
| In contrast, the Map's emphasis is on analyzing the | | | | ignore the feelings/views of their employees. Many |
| individual's thought processes and the line of actions he | | | | good employees have left their organizations to chart |
| she will undertake in problem solving. | | | | their career paths successfully with other companies |
| 3. Support Organization's Strategic HRM Framework. | | | | (usually with their previous firm's competitors) partly |
| The WorkACTIONS Map (as part of the holistic | | | | due to this reason. If companies do not act fast to |
| SOUP Model) was developed to facilitate strategic | | | | curb the employees' perception gap, this usually leads |
| human resource management within an organization. | | | | to a high turnover rate, notably in respect of the firm's |
| For example, senior management can use the Map to | | | | best talents. |
| select suitable personnel when building project teams. | | | | 2. Lower Productivity & Profits. In general, when |
| As different strategies and environments call for a | | | | employees perceive that the organization does not |
| certain mix of people in a team, the Map can heighten | | | | listen and response to them effectively, distrust and |
| the success rate of choosing the right people for the | | | | low morale will ensue. This will affect the employees' |
| right situations. | | | | motivation and decrease productivity and eventually, |
| WorkSMARTS Map: | | | | lower profits. |
| Based on the seminal research work by Harvard's | | | | 3. Strategic Mis-Communication. As the employees on |
| Prof. Howard Gardner, First Quatermain has adapted | | | | the ground are the true experts in their specific areas, |
| and re-defined the concept of Multiple Intelligences for | | | | they are the best people to understand and response |
| workplace relevance. | | | | to market changes. With the absence of good |
| Prof. Gardner's research states that there are several | | | | communication outlets between the employees, senior |
| kinds of intelligences (or SMARTS) inherent and | | | | management may not be able to develop sound |
| nurtured within an individual. This set of intelligences will | | | | organization strategies for market relevance. |
| determine the individual's ways of carrying out certain | | | | The Confluence of the Three Strategic Tools |
| tasks, learning styles, job preferences and more. | | | | The rationale of fusing the three tools as an integrated |
| WorkSMARTS Map consists of these FIVE types of | | | | model is simple and direct. With WorkACTIONS & |
| Intelligences. They are: | | | | WorkSMARTS Maps, an organization is well equipped |
| - Logical/Mathematical Intelligence | | | | to assess and employ new employees, and also to |
| - Visual/Vision Intelligence | | | | manage the existing human resource adaptively. |
| - Interpersonal Intelligence | | | | WorkACTIONS + WorkSMARTS =Putting your |
| - Intrapersonal Intelligence | | | | Employees' SMARTS to ACTIONS! |
| - Linguistic Intelligence | | | | While the following tools can help narrow the risk of |
| WorkSMARTS Map was developed for organizational | | | | errors in personnel recruitment and strategic |
| use based on the following factors: | | | | management of talents, it is only half the battle won. |
| | | | More importantly, how does an organization retain the |
| 1. Different SMARTS for Different Job Functions. With | | | | talents that they have carefully selected and trained? |
| the application of WorkSMARTS Map, an organization | | | | By using the Nature of Effective Organization Profile, a |
| can place the right people with the appropriate mix of | | | | company can better understand their employees and |
| intelligences for specific job functions and | | | | response effectively to their needs. This will help in |
| responsibilities. | | | | retaining and motivating the best talents through |
| 2. Unique set of SMARTS, Unique way of | | | | developing appropriate corporate culture and working |
| Organizational Learning. This realization will enable an | | | | environments. |
| organization to disseminate information effectively and | | | | In a nutshell, the S.O.U. |
| develop appropriate corporate training methodology | | | | |