Welcome to your ultimate human resource management information


acintelligence.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

"importance of strategic management" human resources consulting west virginia
strategic versus traditional planning strategic role of human resource

The Evolution of Project Management

Importance of Project Management is an(1979). In the 1970's other project
important topic because allmanagement tools such as Material
organisations, be they small or large,Requirements Planning (MRP) were also
at one time or other, are involved inintroduced.Examples of projects
implementing new undertakings. Theseundertaken during this period and which
undertakings may be diverse, such as,influenced the development of modem
the development of a new product orproject management as we know it today
service; the establishment of a newinclude: (a)Polaris missile project
production line in a manufacturinginitiated in 1956 that had the objective
enterprise; a public relations promotionof delivering nuclear missiles carried
campaign; or a major building programme.by submarines, known as Fleet Ballistic
Whilst the 1980's were about quality andMissile for the U.S Navy. The project
the 1990's were all about globalisation,successfully launched its first Polaris
the 2000's are about velocity. That is,missile in 1961; (b) Apollo project
to keep ahead of their competitors,initiated in 1960 with the objective of
organisations are continually faced withsending man to the moon; and (c) E.I du
the development of complex products,Pont de Nemours chemical plant project
services and processes with very shortcommencing in 1958, that had the
time-to-market windows combined with theobjective of building major chemical
need for cross-functional expertise. Inproduction plants across the U.S.[3]
this scenario, project management1980-1994: Production Centre Human
becomes a very important and powerfulResources. The 1980s and 1990's are
tool in the hands of organisations thatcharacterised by the revolutionary
understand its use and have thedevelopment in the information
competencies to apply it.The developmentmanagement sector with the introduction
of project management capabilities inof the personal computer (PC) and
organisations, simultaneously with theassociated computer communications
application of information managementnetworking facilities. This development
systems, allow enterprise teams to workresulted in having low cost multitasking
in partnership in defining plans andPCs that had high efficiency in managing
managing take-to-market projects byand controlling complex project
synchronising team-oriented tasks,schedules. During this period low cost
schedules, and resource allocations.project management software for PCs
This allows cross-functional teams tobecame widely available that made
create and share project information.project management techniques more
However, this is not sufficient,easily accessible.Examples of major
information management systems have theprojects undertaken during this period
potential to allow project managementthat illustrate the application of high
practices to take place in a real-timetechnology, and project management tools
environment. As a consequence of thisand practices include: (a) England
potential project managementFrance Channel project, 1989 to1991.
proficiency, locally, nationally orThis project was an international
globally dispersed users are able toproject that involved two governments,
concurrently view and interact with theseveral financial institutions,
same updated project informationengineering construction companies, and
immediately, including projectother various organisations from the two
schedules, threaded discussions, andcountries. The language, use of standard
other relevant documentation. In thismetrics, and other communication
scenario the term dispersed user takesdifferences needed to be closely
on a wider meaning. It not only includescoordinated; (b) Space Shuttle
the cross-functional management teamsChallenger project, 1983 to 1986. The
but also experts drawn from thedisaster of the Challenger space shuttle
organisation's supply chain, andfocused attention on risk management,
business partners.On a macro levelgroup dynamics, and quality management;
organisations are motivated to implementand (c) xv Calgary Winter Olympic of
project management techniques to ensure1988 which successfully applied project
that their undertakings (small or major)management practices to event
are delivered on time, within the costmanagement.[4] 1995-Present: Creating a
budget and to the stipulated quality. OnNew Environment. This period is
a micro level, project managementdominated by the developments related to
combinedthe internet that changed dramatically
with an appropriate informationbusiness practices in the mid 1990's.
management system has the objectives of:The internet has provided fast,
(a) reducing project overhead costs; (b)interactive, and customised new medium
customising the project workplace to fitthat allows people to browse, purchase,
the operational style of the projectand track products and services online
teams and respective team members; (c)instantly. This has resulted in making
proactively informing the executivefirms more productive, more efficient,
management strata of the strategicand more client oriented. Furthermore,
projects on a real-time basis; (d)many of today's project management
ensuring that project team members sharesoftware have an internet connectivity
accurate, meaningful and timely projectfeature. This allows automatic uploading
documents; and (e) ensuring thatof data so that anyone around the globe
critical task deadlines are met. Whilstwith a standard browser can: (a) input
the motivation and objectives to applythe most recent status of their assigned
project management in organisations istasks; (b) find out how the overall
commendable, they do not assure projectproject is doing; (c) be informed of any
success.However, before discussing thedelays or advances in the schedule; and
meaning and achievement of project(d) stay "in the loop" for their project
success it is appropriate at this stagerole, while working independently at a
to provide a brief history of projectremote site.An example of a major
management.Brief History of Projectproject undertaken during this period is
Managementthe Year 2000 (Y2K) project. The Y2K
Project management has been practicedProject, known as the millennium bug
for thousands of years dating back toreferred to the problem that computers
the Egyptian epoch, but it was in themay not function correctly on January
mid-1950's that organisations commencedlst, 2000 at 12 AM. This was a global
applying formal project management toolsphenomenon and was highly problematic
and techniques to complex projects.because resolving the problem at one's
Modern project management methods hadorganisation did not guarantee immunity,
their origins in two parallel butsince a breakdown in the organisation's
different problems of planning andsupply chain could affect the
control in projects in the Unitedorganisation's operating capability.
States. The first case involved the U.SMany organisations set up a project
Navy which at that time was concernedoffice to control and comply with their
with the control of contracts for itsstakeholders regarding the Y2K issue.
Polaris Missile project. These contractsFurthermore, use of the Internet was
consisted of research, development workcommon practice that led to the
and manufacturing of parts that wereestablishment of the virtual project
unique and had never been previouslyoffice. The goal of this virtual project
undertaken.This particular project wasoffice was: (a) to deliver uninterrupted
characterised by high uncertainty, sinceturn-of-the-century; (b) monitor Y2K
neither cost nor time could beproject efforts; (c) provide
accurately estimated. Hence, completioncoordination; (d) develop a risk
times were based on probabilities. Timemanagement plan; and (e) communicate Y2K
estimates were based on optimistic,compliance efforts with various
pessimistic and most likely. These threestakeholders. Thus, the virtual project
time scenarios were mathematicallyoffice was a focal point for all the
assessed to determine the probableproject works, and it increased the
completion date. This procedure wasawareness and importance of risk
called program evaluation reviewmanagement practices to numerous
technique (PERT). Initially, the PERTorganisations.Why Project
technique did not take intoManagement?There is no doubt that
consideration cost. However, the costorganisations today face more aggressive
feature was later included using thecompetition than in the past and the
same estimating approach as with time.business environment they operate in is
Due to the three estimation scenarios,a highly turbulent one. This scenario
PERT was found (and still is) to be besthas increased the need for
suited for projects with a high degreeorganisational accountability for the
of uncertainty reflecting their level ofprivate and public sectors, leading to a
uniqueness. The second case, involvedgreater focus and demand for operational
the private sector, namely, E.I du Ponteffectiveness and
de Nemours Company, which had undertakenefficiency.Effectiveness and efficiency
to construct major chemical plants inmay be facilitated through the
U.S. Unlike the Navy Polaris project,introduction of best practices that are
these construction undertakings requiredable to optimise the management of
accurate time and cost estimates. Theorganisational resources. It has been
methodology developed by this companyshown that operations and projects are
was originally referred to as projectdissimilar with each requiring different
planning and scheduling (PPS). PPSmanagement techniques. Hence, in a
required realistic estimates of cost andproject environment, project management
time, and is thus a more definitivecan: (a) support the achievement of
approach than PERT. The PPS techniqueproject and organisational goals; and
was later developed into the critical(b) provide a greater assurance to
path method (CPM) that became verystakeholders that resources are being
popular with the construction industry.managed effectively.Research by Roberts
During the 1960s and 1970s, both PERTand Furlonger [2] in a study of
and CPM increased their popularityinformation systems projects show that
within the private and public sectors.using a reasonably detailed project
Defence Departments of variousmanagement methodology, as compared to a
countries, NASA, and large engineeringloose methodology, improves productivity
and construction companies world wideby 20 to 30 percent. Furthermore, the
applied project management principlesuse of a formalised project management
and tools to manage large budget,structure to projects can facilitate:
schedule-driven projects. The popularity(a) the clarification of project scope;
in the use of these project management(b) agreement of objectives and goals;
tools during this period coincided with(c) identifying resources needed; (d)
the development of computers and theensuring accountability for results and
associated packages that specialised inperformance; (e) and encouraging the
project management. However, initiallyproject team to focus on the final
these computer packages were very costlybenefits to be achieved. Moreover, the
and were executed only on mainframe orresearch indicates that 85-90% of
mini computers. The use of projectprojects fail to deliver on time, on
management techniques in the 1980s wasbudget and to the quality of performance
facilitated with the advent of theexpected. The major causes identified
personal computer and associated lowfor this situation include:
cost project management software. Hence,(a) Lack of a valid business case
during this period, the manufacturingjustifying the project;
and software development sectors(b) Objectives not properly defined and
commenced to adopt and implementagreed;
sophisticated project management(c) Lack of communication and
practices as well. By the 1990s, projectstakeholder management;
management theories, tools, and(d) Outcomes and/or benefits not
techniques were widely received byproperly defined in measurable terms;
different industries and(e) Lack of quality control;
organisations.Four periods in the(f) Poor estimation of duration and
development of modern projectcost;
management.[1] Prior to 1958: Craft(g) Inadequate definition and
system to human relations. During thisacceptance of roles (governance);
time, the evolution of technology, such(h) Insufficient planning and
as, automobiles and telecommunicationscoordination of resources.It should be
shortened the project schedule. Foremphasised that the causes for the
instance, automobiles allowed effectivefailure to deliver on time, on budget
resource allocation and mobility, whilstand to the quality of performance
the telecommunication system increasedexpected could be addressed by the
the speed of communication. Furthermore,application of project management
the job specification which later becamepractices. Furthermore, the failure to
the basis of developing the Workdeliver on time, on budget and to the
Breakdown Structure (WBS) was widelyquality of performance expected does not
used and Henry Gantt invented the Ganttnecessarily mean that the project was
chart. Examples of projects undertakenitself a failure. At this stage what is
during this period as supported bybeing discussed is the effectiveness and
documented evidence include: (a)efficiency of project execution and not
Building the Pacific Railroad in 1850's;whether a project is a success or
(b) Construction of the Hoover Dam infailure.Conclusion
1931-1936, that employed approximatelyProject management should be viewed as
5,200 workers and is still one of thea tool that helps organisations to
highest gravity dams in the U.S.execute designated projects effectively
generating about four billion kilowattand efficiently. The use of this tool
hours a year; and (c) The Manhattandoes not automatically guarantee project
Project in 1942-1945 that was thesuccess. (project success will be
pioneer research and development projectdiscussed in a subsequent issue).
for producing the atomic bomb, involvingHowever, in preparation for the next
125,000 workers and costing nearly $2issue, I would like you to think about
billion.[2] 1958-1979: Application ofthe distinction between project success
Management Science. Significantand project management success. This
technology advancement took placedistinction will provide further insight
between 1958 and 1979, such as, theto the questions: Why are some projects
first automatic plain-paper copier byperceived as failures when they have met
Xerox in 1959. Between 1956 and 1958all the traditional standards of
several core project management toolssuccess, namely, completed on time,
including CPM and PERT were introduced.completed within budget, and meeting all
However, this period was characterisedthe technical specifications? Why are
by the rapid development of computersome projects perceived to be successful
technology. The progression from thewhen they have failed to meet two
mainframe to the mini-computer in theimportant criteria that are
1970's made computers affordable totraditionally associated with success,
medium size companies. In 1975, Billnamely, not completed on time and not
Gates and Paul Allen founded Microsoft.completed within budget?Sandro Azzopardi
Furthermore, the evolution of computeris a professional author who writes
technology facilitated the emergence ofseveral articles on various subjects on
several project management softwarehis web site and local newspapers and
companies, including, Artemis (1977),magazines.
Oracle (1977), and Scitor Corporation



1 A B C D E 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118