Welcome to your ultimate human resource management information


acintelligence.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

"importance of strategic management" human resources consulting west virginia
strategic versus traditional planning strategic role of human resource

The Evolution of Project Management

Importance of Project Management is anduring this period and which influenced the
important topic because all organisations, bedevelopment of modem project management as we
they small or large, at one time or other,know it today include: (a)Polaris missile
are involved in implementing newproject initiated in 1956 that had the
undertakings. These undertakings may beobjective of delivering nuclear missiles
diverse, such as, the development of a newcarried by submarines, known as Fleet
product or service; the establishment of aBallistic Missile for the U.S Navy. The
new production line in a manufacturingproject successfully launched its first
enterprise; a public relations promotionPolaris missile in 1961; (b) Apollo project
campaign; or a major building programme.initiated in 1960 with the objective of
Whilst the 1980's were about quality and thesending man to the moon; and (c) E.I du Pont
1990's were all about globalisation, thede Nemours chemical plant project commencing
2000's are about velocity. That is, to keepin 1958, that had the objective of building
ahead of their competitors, organisations aremajor chemical production plants across the
continually faced with the development ofU.S.[3] 1980-1994: Production Centre Human
complex products, services and processes withResources. The 1980s and 1990's are
very short time-to-market windows combinedcharacterised by the revolutionary
with the need for cross-functional expertise.development in the information management
In this scenario, project management becomessector with the introduction of the personal
a very important and powerful tool in thecomputer (PC) and associated computer
hands of organisations that understand itscommunications networking facilities. This
use and have the competencies to apply it.Thedevelopment resulted in having low cost
development of project managementmultitasking PCs that had high efficiency in
capabilities in organisations, simultaneouslymanaging and controlling complex project
with the application of informationschedules. During this period low cost
management systems, allow enterprise teams toproject management software for PCs became
work in partnership in defining plans andwidely available that made project management
managing take-to-market projects bytechniques more easily accessible.Examples of
synchronising team-oriented tasks, schedules,major projects undertaken during this period
and resource allocations. This allowsthat illustrate the application of high
cross-functional teams to create and sharetechnology, and project management tools and
project information. However, this is notpractices include: (a) England France Channel
sufficient, information management systemsproject, 1989 to1991. This project was an
have the potential to allow projectinternational project that involved two
management practices to take place in agovernments, several financial institutions,
real-time environment. As a consequence ofengineering construction companies, and other
this potential project managementvarious organisations from the two countries.
proficiency, locally, nationally or globallyThe language, use of standard metrics, and
dispersed users are able to concurrently viewother communication differences needed to be
and interact with the same updated projectclosely coordinated; (b) Space Shuttle
information immediately, including projectChallenger project, 1983 to 1986. The
schedules, threaded discussions, and otherdisaster of the Challenger space shuttle
relevant documentation. In this scenario thefocused attention on risk management, group
term dispersed user takes on a wider meaning.dynamics, and quality management; and (c) xv
It not only includes the cross-functionalCalgary Winter Olympic of 1988 which
management teams but also experts drawn fromsuccessfully applied project management
the organisation's supply chain, and businesspractices to event management.[4]
partners.On a macro level organisations are1995-Present: Creating a New Environment.
motivated to implement project managementThis period is dominated by the developments
techniques to ensure that their undertakingsrelated to the internet that changed
(small or major) are delivered on time,dramatically business practices in the mid
within the cost budget and to the stipulated1990's. The internet has provided fast,
quality. On a micro level, project managementinteractive, and customised new medium that
combinedallows people to browse, purchase, and track
products and services online instantly. This
with an appropriate information managementhas resulted in making firms more productive,
system has the objectives of: (a) reducingmore efficient, and more client oriented.
project overhead costs; (b) customising theFurthermore, many of today's project
project workplace to fit the operationalmanagement software have an internet
style of the project teams and respectiveconnectivity feature. This allows automatic
team members; (c) proactively informing theuploading of data so that anyone around the
executive management strata of the strategicglobe with a standard browser can: (a) input
projects on a real-time basis; (d) ensuringthe most recent status of their assigned
that project team members share accurate,tasks; (b) find out how the overall project
meaningful and timely project documents; andis doing; (c) be informed of any delays or
(e) ensuring that critical task deadlines areadvances in the schedule; and (d) stay "in
met. Whilst the motivation and objectives tothe loop" for their project role, while
apply project management in organisations isworking independently at a remote site.An
commendable, they do not assure projectexample of a major project undertaken during
success.However, before discussing thethis period is the Year 2000 (Y2K) project.
meaning and achievement of project success itThe Y2K Project, known as the millennium bug
is appropriate at this stage to provide areferred to the problem that computers may
brief history of project management.Briefnot function correctly on January lst, 2000
History  of  Project  Managementat 12 AM. This was a global phenomenon and
was highly problematic because resolving the
Project management has been practiced forproblem at one's organisation did not
thousands of years dating back to theguarantee immunity, since a breakdown in the
Egyptian epoch, but it was in the mid-1950'sorganisation's supply chain could affect the
that organisations commenced applying formalorganisation's operating capability. Many
project management tools and techniques toorganisations set up a project office to
complex projects. Modern project managementcontrol and comply with their stakeholders
methods had their origins in two parallel butregarding the Y2K issue. Furthermore, use of
different problems of planning and control inthe Internet was common practice that led to
projects in the United States. The first casethe establishment of the virtual project
involved the U.S Navy which at that time wasoffice. The goal of this virtual project
concerned with the control of contracts foroffice was: (a) to deliver uninterrupted
its Polaris Missile project. These contractsturn-of-the-century; (b) monitor Y2K project
consisted of research, development work andefforts; (c) provide coordination; (d)
manufacturing of parts that were unique anddevelop a risk management plan; and (e)
had never been previously undertaken.Thiscommunicate Y2K compliance efforts with
particular project was characterised by highvarious stakeholders. Thus, the virtual
uncertainty, since neither cost nor timeproject office was a focal point for all the
could be accurately estimated. Hence,project works, and it increased the awareness
completion times were based on probabilities.and importance of risk management practices
Time estimates were based on optimistic,to numerous organisations.Why Project
pessimistic and most likely. These three timeManagement?There is no doubt that
scenarios were mathematically assessed toorganisations today face more aggressive
determine the probable completion date. Thiscompetition than in the past and the business
procedure was called program evaluationenvironment they operate in is a highly
review technique (PERT). Initially, the PERTturbulent one. This scenario has increased
technique did not take into considerationthe need for organisational accountability
cost. However, the cost feature was laterfor the private and public sectors, leading
included using the same estimating approachto a greater focus and demand for operational
as with time. Due to the three estimationeffectiveness and efficiency.Effectiveness
scenarios, PERT was found (and still is) toand efficiency may be facilitated through the
be best suited for projects with a highintroduction of best practices that are able
degree of uncertainty reflecting their levelto optimise the management of organisational
of uniqueness. The second case, involved theresources. It has been shown that operations
private sector, namely, E.I du Pont deand projects are dissimilar with each
Nemours Company, which had undertaken torequiring different management techniques.
construct major chemical plants in U.S.Hence, in a project environment, project
Unlike the Navy Polaris project, thesemanagement can: (a) support the achievement
construction undertakings required accurateof project and organisational goals; and (b)
time and cost estimates. The methodologyprovide a greater assurance to stakeholders
developed by this company was originallythat resources are being managed
referred to as project planning andeffectively.Research by Roberts and Furlonger
scheduling (PPS). PPS required realistic[2] in a study of information systems
estimates of cost and time, and is thus aprojects show that using a reasonably
more definitive approach than PERT. The PPSdetailed project management methodology, as
technique was later developed into thecompared to a loose methodology, improves
critical path method (CPM) that became veryproductivity by 20 to 30 percent.
popular with the construction industry.Furthermore, the use of a formalised project
During the 1960s and 1970s, both PERT and CPMmanagement structure to projects can
increased their popularity within the privatefacilitate: (a) the clarification of project
and public sectors. Defence Departments ofscope; (b) agreement of objectives and goals;
various countries, NASA, and large(c) identifying resources needed; (d)
engineering and construction companies worldensuring accountability for results and
wide applied project management principlesperformance; (e) and encouraging the project
and tools to manage large budget,team to focus on the final benefits to be
schedule-driven projects. The popularity inachieved. Moreover, the research indicates
the use of these project management toolsthat 85-90% of projects fail to deliver on
during this period coincided with thetime, on budget and to the quality of
development of computers and the associatedperformance expected. The major causes
packages that specialised in projectidentified  for  this  situation  include:
management. However, initially these computer
packages were very costly and were executed(a) Lack of a valid business case justifying
only on mainframe or mini computers. The usethe  project;
of project management techniques in the 1980s
was facilitated with the advent of the(b) Objectives not properly defined and
personal computer and associated low costagreed;
project management software. Hence, during
this period, the manufacturing and software(c) Lack of communication and stakeholder
development sectors commenced to adopt andmanagement;
implement sophisticated project management
practices as well. By the 1990s, project(d) Outcomes and/or benefits not properly
management theories, tools, and techniquesdefined  in  measurable  terms;
were widely received by different industries
and organisations.Four periods in the(e)  Lack  of  quality  control;
development of modern project management.[1]
Prior to 1958: Craft system to human(f)  Poor  estimation  of duration and cost;
relations. During this time, the evolution of
technology, such as, automobiles and(g) Inadequate definition and acceptance of
telecommunications shortened the projectroles  (governance);
schedule. For instance, automobiles allowed
effective resource allocation and mobility,(h) Insufficient planning and coordination
whilst the telecommunication system increasedof resources.It should be emphasised that the
the speed of communication. Furthermore, thecauses for the failure to deliver on time, on
job specification which later became thebudget and to the quality of performance
basis of developing the Work Breakdownexpected could be addressed by the
Structure (WBS) was widely used and Henryapplication of project management practices.
Gantt invented the Gantt chart. Examples ofFurthermore, the failure to deliver on time,
projects undertaken during this period ason budget and to the quality of performance
supported by documented evidence include: (a)expected does not necessarily mean that the
Building the Pacific Railroad in 1850's; (b)project was itself a failure. At this stage
Construction of the Hoover Dam in 1931-1936,what is being discussed is the effectiveness
that employed approximately 5,200 workers andand efficiency of project execution and not
is still one of the highest gravity dams inwhether a project is a success or
the U.S. generating about four billionfailure.Conclusion
kilowatt hours a year; and (c) The Manhattan
Project in 1942-1945 that was the pioneerProject management should be viewed as a
research and development project fortool that helps organisations to execute
producing the atomic bomb, involving 125,000designated projects effectively and
workers and costing nearly $2 billion.[2]efficiently. The use of this tool does not
1958-1979: Application of Management Science.automatically guarantee project success.
Significant technology advancement took place(project success will be discussed in a
between 1958 and 1979, such as, the firstsubsequent issue). However, in preparation
automatic plain-paper copier by Xerox infor the next issue, I would like you to think
1959. Between 1956 and 1958 several coreabout the distinction between project success
project management tools including CPM andand project management success. This
PERT were introduced. However, this perioddistinction will provide further insight to
was characterised by the rapid development ofthe questions: Why are some projects
computer technology. The progression from theperceived as failures when they have met all
mainframe to the mini-computer in the 1970'sthe traditional standards of success, namely,
made computers affordable to medium sizecompleted on time, completed within budget,
companies. In 1975, Bill Gates and Paul Allenand meeting all the technical specifications?
founded Microsoft. Furthermore, the evolutionWhy are some projects perceived to be
of computer technology facilitated thesuccessful when they have failed to meet two
emergence of several project managementimportant criteria that are traditionally
software companies, including, Artemisassociated with success, namely, not
(1977), Oracle (1977), and Scitor Corporationcompleted on time and not completed within
(1979). In the 1970's other projectbudget?Sandro Azzopardi is a professional
management tools such as Materialauthor who writes several articles on various
Requirements Planning (MRP) were alsosubjects on his web site and local newspapers
introduced.Examples of projects undertakenand magazines.



1 A B C D E 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118