The Evolution of Project Management

Importance of Project Management is an importantScitor Corporation (1979). In the 1970's other project
topic because all organisations, be they small or large,management tools such as Material Requirements
at one time or other, are involved in implementing newPlanning (MRP) were also introduced.Examples of
undertakings. These undertakings may be diverse,projects undertaken during this period and which
such as, the development of a new product or service;influenced the development of modem project
the establishment of a new production line in amanagement as we know it today include: (a)Polaris
manufacturing enterprise; a public relations promotionmissile project initiated in 1956 that had the objective of
campaign; or a major building programme. Whilst thedelivering nuclear missiles carried by submarines,
1980's were about quality and the 1990's were all aboutknown as Fleet Ballistic Missile for the U.S Navy. The
globalisation, the 2000's are about velocity. That is, toproject successfully launched its first Polaris missile in
keep ahead of their competitors, organisations are1961; (b) Apollo project initiated in 1960 with the
continually faced with the development of complexobjective of sending man to the moon; and (c) E.I du
products, services and processes with very shortPont de Nemours chemical plant project commencing
time-to-market windows combined with the need forin 1958, that had the objective of building major
cross-functional expertise. In this scenario, projectchemical production plants across the U.S.[3] 1980-1994:
management becomes a very important and powerfulProduction Centre Human Resources. The 1980s and
tool in the hands of organisations that understand its1990's are characterised by the revolutionary
use and have the competencies to apply it.Thedevelopment in the information management sector
development of project management capabilities inwith the introduction of the personal computer (PC)
organisations, simultaneously with the application ofand associated computer communications networking
information management systems, allow enterprisefacilities. This development resulted in having low cost
teams to work in partnership in defining plans andmultitasking PCs that had high efficiency in managing
managing take-to-market projects by synchronisingand controlling complex project schedules. During this
team-oriented tasks, schedules, and resourceperiod low cost project management software for
allocations. This allows cross-functional teams toPCs became widely available that made project
create and share project information. However, this ismanagement techniques more easily
not sufficient, information management systems haveaccessible.Examples of major projects undertaken
the potential to allow project management practices toduring this period that illustrate the application of high
take place in a real-time environment. As atechnology, and project management tools and
consequence of this potential project managementpractices include: (a) England France Channel project,
proficiency, locally, nationally or globally dispersed users1989 to1991. This project was an international project
are able to concurrently view and interact with thethat involved two governments, several financial
same updated project information immediately, includinginstitutions, engineering construction companies, and
project schedules, threaded discussions, and otherother various organisations from the two countries.
relevant documentation. In this scenario the termThe language, use of standard metrics, and other
dispersed user takes on a wider meaning. It not onlycommunication differences needed to be closely
includes the cross-functional management teams butcoordinated; (b) Space Shuttle Challenger project, 1983
also experts drawn from the organisation's supplyto 1986. The disaster of the Challenger space shuttle
chain, and business partners.On a macro levelfocused attention on risk management, group
organisations are motivated to implement projectdynamics, and quality management; and (c) xv Calgary
management techniques to ensure that theirWinter Olympic of 1988 which successfully applied
undertakings (small or major) are delivered on time,project management practices to event
within the cost budget and to the stipulated quality. Onmanagement.[4] 1995-Present: Creating a New
a micro level, project management combinedEnvironment. This period is dominated by the
with an appropriate information management systemdevelopments related to the internet that changed
has the objectives of: (a) reducing project overheaddramatically business practices in the mid 1990's. The
costs; (b) customising the project workplace to fit theinternet has provided fast, interactive, and customised
operational style of the project teams and respectivenew medium that allows people to browse, purchase,
team members; (c) proactively informing the executiveand track products and services online instantly. This
management strata of the strategic projects on ahas resulted in making firms more productive, more
real-time basis; (d) ensuring that project teamefficient, and more client oriented. Furthermore, many
members share accurate, meaningful and timelyof today's project management software have an
project documents; and (e) ensuring that critical taskinternet connectivity feature. This allows automatic
deadlines are met. Whilst the motivation and objectivesuploading of data so that anyone around the globe
to apply project management in organisations iswith a standard browser can: (a) input the most recent
commendable, they do not assure projectstatus of their assigned tasks; (b) find out how the
success.However, before discussing the meaning andoverall project is doing; (c) be informed of any delays
achievement of project success it is appropriate at thisor advances in the schedule; and (d) stay "in the loop"
stage to provide a brief history of projectfor their project role, while working independently at a
management.Brief History of Project Managementremote site.An example of a major project undertaken
Project management has been practiced forduring this period is the Year 2000 (Y2K) project. The
thousands of years dating back to the Egyptian epoch,Y2K Project, known as the millennium bug referred to
but it was in the mid-1950's that organisationsthe problem that computers may not function correctly
commenced applying formal project managementon January lst, 2000 at 12 AM. This was a global
tools and techniques to complex projects. Modernphenomenon and was highly problematic because
project management methods had their origins in tworesolving the problem at one's organisation did not
parallel but different problems of planning and control inguarantee immunity, since a breakdown in the
projects in the United States. The first case involvedorganisation's supply chain could affect the
the U.S Navy which at that time was concerned withorganisation's operating capability. Many organisations
the control of contracts for its Polaris Missile project.set up a project office to control and comply with their
These contracts consisted of research, developmentstakeholders regarding the Y2K issue. Furthermore,
work and manufacturing of parts that were unique anduse of the Internet was common practice that led to
had never been previously undertaken.This particularthe establishment of the virtual project office. The goal
project was characterised by high uncertainty, sinceof this virtual project office was: (a) to deliver
neither cost nor time could be accurately estimated.uninterrupted turn-of-the-century; (b) monitor Y2K
Hence, completion times were based on probabilities.project efforts; (c) provide coordination; (d) develop a
Time estimates were based on optimistic, pessimisticrisk management plan; and (e) communicate Y2K
and most likely. These three time scenarios werecompliance efforts with various stakeholders. Thus, the
mathematically assessed to determine the probablevirtual project office was a focal point for all the
completion date. This procedure was called programproject works, and it increased the awareness and
evaluation review technique (PERT). Initially, the PERTimportance of risk management practices to numerous
technique did not take into consideration cost.organisations.Why Project Management?There is no
However, the cost feature was later included using thedoubt that organisations today face more aggressive
same estimating approach as with time. Due to thecompetition than in the past and the business
three estimation scenarios, PERT was found (and stillenvironment they operate in is a highly turbulent one.
is) to be best suited for projects with a high degree ofThis scenario has increased the need for
uncertainty reflecting their level of uniqueness. Theorganisational accountability for the private and public
second case, involved the private sector, namely, E.I dusectors, leading to a greater focus and demand for
Pont de Nemours Company, which had undertaken tooperational effectiveness and efficiency.Effectiveness
construct major chemical plants in U.S. Unlike the Navyand efficiency may be facilitated through the
Polaris project, these construction undertakingsintroduction of best practices that are able to optimise
required accurate time and cost estimates. Thethe management of organisational resources. It has
methodology developed by this company wasbeen shown that operations and projects are dissimilar
originally referred to as project planning and schedulingwith each requiring different management techniques.
(PPS). PPS required realistic estimates of cost andHence, in a project environment, project management
time, and is thus a more definitive approach thancan: (a) support the achievement of project and
PERT. The PPS technique was later developed intoorganisational goals; and (b) provide a greater
the critical path method (CPM) that became veryassurance to stakeholders that resources are being
popular with the construction industry. During the 1960smanaged effectively.Research by Roberts and
and 1970s, both PERT and CPM increased theirFurlonger [2] in a study of information systems
popularity within the private and public sectors.projects show that using a reasonably detailed project
Defence Departments of various countries, NASA,management methodology, as compared to a loose
and large engineering and construction companiesmethodology, improves productivity by 20 to 30
world wide applied project management principles andpercent. Furthermore, the use of a formalised project
tools to manage large budget, schedule-driven projects.management structure to projects can facilitate: (a) the
The popularity in the use of these projectclarification of project scope; (b) agreement of
management tools during this period coincided with theobjectives and goals; (c) identifying resources needed;
development of computers and the associated(d) ensuring accountability for results and performance;
packages that specialised in project management.(e) and encouraging the project team to focus on the
However, initially these computer packages were veryfinal benefits to be achieved. Moreover, the research
costly and were executed only on mainframe or miniindicates that 85-90% of projects fail to deliver on time,
computers. The use of project managementon budget and to the quality of performance expected.
techniques in the 1980s was facilitated with the adventThe major causes identified for this situation include:
of the personal computer and associated low cost(a) Lack of a valid business case justifying the project;
project management software. Hence, during this
period, the manufacturing and software development(b) Objectives not properly defined and agreed;
sectors commenced to adopt and implement(c) Lack of communication and stakeholder
sophisticated project management practices as well.management;
By the 1990s, project management theories, tools, and(d) Outcomes and/or benefits not properly defined in
techniques were widely received by different industriesmeasurable terms;
and organisations.Four periods in the development of(e) Lack of quality control;
modern project management.[1] Prior to 1958: Craft(f) Poor estimation of duration and cost;
system to human relations. During this time, the(g) Inadequate definition and acceptance of roles
evolution of technology, such as, automobiles and(governance);
telecommunications shortened the project schedule.(h) Insufficient planning and coordination of resources.It
For instance, automobiles allowed effective resourceshould be emphasised that the causes for the failure
allocation and mobility, whilst the telecommunicationto deliver on time, on budget and to the quality of
system increased the speed of communication.performance expected could be addressed by the
Furthermore, the job specification which later becameapplication of project management practices.
the basis of developing the Work BreakdownFurthermore, the failure to deliver on time, on budget
Structure (WBS) was widely used and Henry Ganttand to the quality of performance expected does not
invented the Gantt chart. Examples of projectsnecessarily mean that the project was itself a failure.
undertaken during this period as supported byAt this stage what is being discussed is the
documented evidence include: (a) Building the Pacificeffectiveness and efficiency of project execution and
Railroad in 1850's; (b) Construction of the Hoover Damnot whether a project is a success or
in 1931-1936, that employed approximately 5,200failure.Conclusion
workers and is still one of the highest gravity dams inProject management should be viewed as a tool that
the U.S. generating about four billion kilowatt hours ahelps organisations to execute designated projects
year; and (c) The Manhattan Project in 1942-1945 thateffectively and efficiently. The use of this tool does not
was the pioneer research and development projectautomatically guarantee project success. (project
for producing the atomic bomb, involving 125,000success will be discussed in a subsequent issue).
workers and costing nearly $2 billion.[2] 1958-1979:However, in preparation for the next issue, I would like
Application of Management Science. Significantyou to think about the distinction between project
technology advancement took place between 1958success and project management success. This
and 1979, such as, the first automatic plain-paper copierdistinction will provide further insight to the questions:
by Xerox in 1959. Between 1956 and 1958 severalWhy are some projects perceived as failures when
core project management tools including CPM andthey have met all the traditional standards of success,
PERT were introduced. However, this period wasnamely, completed on time, completed within budget,
characterised by the rapid development of computerand meeting all the technical specifications? Why are
technology. The progression from the mainframe tosome projects perceived to be successful when they
the mini-computer in the 1970's made computershave failed to meet two important criteria that are
affordable to medium size companies. In 1975, Billtraditionally associated with success, namely, not
Gates and Paul Allen founded Microsoft. Furthermore,completed on time and not completed within
the evolution of computer technology facilitated thebudget?Sandro Azzopardi is a professional author
emergence of several project management softwarewho writes several articles on various subjects on his
companies, including, Artemis (1977), Oracle (1977), andweb site and local newspapers and magazines.