Analysis of Project Success Criteria and Success Factors

We often hear or read about various success stories.However, more resent research by Turner and Muller
But what is success and what criteria should(2005, p59) has concluded that "the leadership style
organizations use to identify success? What factorsand competence of the project manager have no
lead to a successful project? The purpose of thisimpact on project success". It is very interesting to
article is to define project success criteria, clarify theirinvestigate why a highly respectable professional body
difference with success factors and analyse theirfor project managers published such a contradictive
importance in project management methodology.Oneposition. A possible answer could be found in the fact
of the vaguest concepts of project management isthat project manager's results are difficult to prove and
project success. Since each individual or group ofeven more difficult to measure. If the project is
people who are involved in a project have differentsuccessful, senior management will probably claim that
needs and expectations, it is very unsurprising thatall external factors were favourable. On the contrary, if
they interpret project success in their own way ofit turns to be a failure, project manager easily
understanding (Cleland & Ireland, 2004, p2). "For thosebecomes the scapegoat.2. The project teamProject
involved with a project, project success is normallymanagers are very lucky if they have the option to
thought of as the achievement of somechoose their project team. More often, their team is
pre-determined project goals" (Lim & Mohamed, 1999,inherited to the project from various sectors of the
p244) while the general public has different views,organisation. It is vital to have a good project team to
commonly based on user satisfaction. A classicwork with, with core skills that can be evolved to core
example of different perspective of successful projectcompetences and capabilities for the whole
is the Sydney Opera House project (Thomsett, 2002),organisation. All members of the project team must be
which went 16 times over budget and took 4 timescommitted to the success of the project and the
more to finish than originally planned. But the finaloverall mission of the company. Apart from their skills
impact that the Opera House created was so big thatand commitment, project team members should have
no one remembers the original missed goals. Theclear communication channels to access "both the
project was a big success for the people and at thefunctional manager and the project manager within a
same time a big failure from the project managementmatrix organization. Effective management of this dual
perspective. On the other hand, the Millennium Dome inreporting is often a critical success factor for the
London was a project on time and on budget but inproject" (PMBOK Guide, 2004, p215).3. The project
the eyes of the British people was considered a failureitselfThe type of a project underlines some factors
because it didn't deliver the awe and glamour that itthat are important to success. For example, if a
was supposed to generate (Cammack, 2005). "In theproject is urgent, the critical factor in that case is time.
same way that quality requires both conformance toThe Wembley stadium is expected to be fully
the specifications and fitness for use, project successoperational due to May's 2006 FA Cup Final and that is
requires a combination of product success (service,the primary target. However, the increase of cost "that
result, or outcome) and project management success"has thrown the management's calculations out of kilter"
(Duncan, 2004).The difference between criteria and(Evans, 2005) was not a big issue at that time. The
factors is fuzzy for many people. The Cambridgesize, value of a project and it's uniqueness of activities
Advanced Learner's Dictionary describes a criterion ascan be a puzzle for the project manager who is used
"a standard by which you judge, decide about or dealto planning and co-ordinating common and simple
with something" while a factor is explained as "a factactivities (Belassi & Tukel, 1996, p144).4. The
or situation which influences the result of something".organizationTop management support is the principal
Lim & Mohamed applied those definitions to projectsuccess factor for many independent research groups
success and illustrated the difference as show in(Tukel & Rom, 1998, p48) (CHAOS Report, 2001, p4)
Figure 1. It is clear now that critical factors can lead to(Cleland & Ireland, 2002, p210) (Tinnirello, 2002, p14) ,
a series of events which ultimately meet the overallwhich means that no project can finish successfully
success criteria of the project, so they shouldn't beunless the project manager secures true support from
used as synonymous terms.Success CriteriaMany liststhe senior or operational management. It is extremely
of success criteria have been introduced in thedifficult to work in a hostile environment where nobody
previous decades by various researchers. Primalunderstands the benefits that the project will deliver to
success criteria have been an integrated part ofthe organisation. "Stakeholder management and
project management theory given that early definitionscontract strategies (number of and size of the
of project management included the so called 'Ironcontracts, interface between the different contracts
Triangle' success criteria - cost, time and quality.and the management of contracts) are separate
(Atkinson, 1999, p338)Atkinson continues that "as asuccess factors which are also considered part of
discipline, project management has not really changedorganization issues" (Torp, Austeng & Mengesha, 2004,
or developed the success measurement criteria inp4).5. The external environmentExternal environment
almost 50 years". To meet the urgent need ofcan be the political, economic, socio-culture and
modernizing the out of date success criteria, hetechnological (PEST) context in which the project is
suggest the 'Square Route' (figure 3) success criteriaexecuted. Factors like the weather, work accidents or
instead of the 'Iron Triangle', where he groups thethe government's favourable or unfavourable legislation
criteria that other academics have proposed. The maincan affect the project in all of its phases. "Note that if
change is the addition of qualitative objectives rathera client is from outside the organization, he should also
than quantitative, namely the benefits that differentbe considered as an external factor influencing the
group of people can receive from the project. Theseproject performance" (Belassi & Tukel, 1996, p145).
benefits are seen from two perspectives, one fromCompetitors should also be accounted as external
the organisational view and one from the stakeholdersfactors which can undermine project success
view. It is obvious that each part will have benefitbecause the original project could be overshadowed
differently from projects. For example one organisationby a more glamorous and successful project launched
can gain profit through achieving strategic goals whenby another organisation.ConclusionIt is critical for a
a project is completed and at the same time theseproject manager to understand what the stakeholders
goals have a serious environmental impact in theconsider as a successful project. In order to avoid any
stakeholders' community. This means that a successfulsurprises at the end of the project, there is an urgent
project must bargain between the benefits of theneed to identify the different perspectives of what
organisation and the satisfaction of end users. Thesuccess means before the project goes live. It is also
fourth corner of the 'Square Root' is the Informationvital to remember that success criteria are the
System which includes the subjects of maintainability,standards by which a project will be judged, while
reliability and validity of project outcomes.One of thesuccess factors are the facts that shape the result of
"Square's root" corners, organisational benefits, drewprojects. Success criteria have changed considerably
much attention because of it's significance and it wasthrough time and moved from the classic iron triangle's
further analysed. Kerzner (2001, p6) suggests threeview of time, cost and quality to a broader framework
criteria from the organization perspective in order for awhich include benefits for the organisation and user
project to be successful. The first is that it must besatisfaction. An additional framework to capture
completed "with minimum or mutually agreed uponsuccess criteria depending on time was also described.
scope changes", even though stakeholders constantlyAs for success factors, they were grouped into five
have different views about projects' results (Maylor,distinct sets and the literature views were find to
2005, p288). Second, "without disturbing the main workcontradict on the issue of how critical a project
flow of the organization" because a project has tomanager is to the final success of the project. A
assist organisation's everyday operations and try tocommon factor mentioned by many authors is senior
make them more efficient and effective. Finally, itmanagement support for the project and it is
should be completed "without changing the corporaterecognized as one of the most important factors of all.
culture" even though projects are "almost exclusivelyIn conclusion, early definition of success criteria can
concerned with change - with knocking down the oldensure an undisputed view of how the project will be
and building up the new" (Baguley, 1995, p8). A projectjudged and early detection of success factors will
manager's main responsibility is to make sure that heguarantee a safe path to deliver success.References1.
delivers change only where is necessary, otherwise heA Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge,
is doomed to find strong resistance from almost all2004, 3rd Edition, Project Management Institute, USA2.
organisational departments (Kerzner, 2001, p158) whichAtkinson, 1999, Project management: cost, time and
ultimately could lead to project failure.A morequality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time
structured approach to project success is grouping theto accept other success criteria, International Journal of
criteria into categories. Wideman (1996, p3-4) describesProject Management Vol. 17, No. 6, pp 337-342,
four groups, all of them time dependent: "internal[Electronic]3. Baguley, 1995, Managing Successful
project objectives (efficiency during the project),Projects: A guide for every manager, Pitman Publishing,
benefit to customer (effectiveness in the short term),London UK, p84. Belassi & Tukel, 1996, A new
direct contribution (in the medium term) and futureframework for determining critical success-failure
opportunity (in the long term)". The characterization offactors in projects, International Journal of Project
'time dependent' is based on the fact that successManagement Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 141-151, [Electronic]5.
varies with time. Looking at the future benefits of theCambridge University, The Cambridge Advanced
organisation can be really difficult, because in someLearner's Dictionary, 2005, 2nd Edition, Cambridge
cases they don't even know what they want, yet isUniversity Press, UK6. Cammack, 2005, Principles of
vital to know what the project is trying to achieveProject Management - 1st session, MSc in Project
after completion time so that success criteria areManagement, Lancaster University7. Cleland & Ireland,
clearly defined in the early stages. This is quite a2002, p210, Project Management: Strategic Design and
different approach, because the focus moves fromimplementation, McGraw-Hill Professional, USA8.
the present success criteria to the future, in a wayCleland & Ireland, 2004, Project Manager's Portable
that a project can be unsuccessful during execution ifHandbook, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, USA, page 2109.
it is judged by criteria like cost and quality, but in theCooke-Davies, The "real" success factors on projects,
long term it can turn to be a thriving story. A goodInternational Journal of Project Management vol.20, pp.
example of this hypothesis is hosting the Olympic185-190, [Electronic]10. Duncan, 2004, Defining and
Games in Athens, Greece, which received massMeasuring Project Success, Project Management
criticism both during the planning period, due to delays inPartners, [Online], Available: , [2005, Nov.4]11. Evans,
construction time, and when it was finished, due to2005, Overdue and over budget, over and over again,
huge cost. But the benefits that Greece will gain fromThe Economist Jun 9th 2005, [Electronic]12. Kerzner,
the Olympic Games can be fully understood after 5 or2001, Project Management - A Systems Approach to
maybe 10 years from the hosting yearPlanning, Scheduling and Controlling, 7th Edition, John
(Athens2004.com).All the above success criteriaWiley & Sons, New York13. Kerzner, 2001, Strategic
"should be simple and attainable and, once defined,planning for project management using a project
they should also be ranked according to priority" (Rightmanagement maturity model, Wiley & Sons, New
Track Associates, 2003). Straightforward criteria areYork, page 15814. Lim & Mohamed, 1999, Criteria of
easy to understand by everyone involved in theproject success: an exploratory re-examination,
project and therefore commitment is guaranteed.International Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No.
Unrealistic criteria can put a 'failure' label on many4, pp. 243-248, [Electronic]15. Maylor, 2005, Project
projects because of the unreachable standards, canManagement, Third Edition with CD Microsoft Project,
generate low team esteem and team performance inPrentice Hall, UK, p28816. Rad & Levin, 2002, The
future projects and finally generate unfairAdvanced Project Management Office, St.Lucie Press,
disappointment among stakeholders. As for priorityUSA, page 1817. Right Track Associates, 2003,
issues, it is inevitable that things will go wrong and theDefining project success, [Online], Available: , [2005,
project manager will be in a tough situation where heNov.5]18. The official website of the Athens 2004
must make the right decision having in mind that he hasOlympic Games, [Online], Available: , [2005, Nov.6]19.
to sacrifice the least important successThe Standish Group International, 2001, Extreme
criterion.Success FactorsAs mentioned earlier,CHAOS: The Standish Group International,
"success factors are those inputs to the management[Electronic]20. Thomsett, 2002, Radical Project
system that lead directly or indirectly to the success ofManagement, Prentice Hall, USA, page 1621. Tinnirello,
the project or business" (Cooke-Davies, 2002, p185).2002, New Directions in Project Management,
Some project managers "intuitively and informallyAuerbach, USA, page 1422. Torp, Austeng &
determine their own success factors. However, ifMengesha, 2004, Critical Success factors for project
these factors are not explicitly identified and recorded,performance: a study from from-end assessments of
they will not become part of formal projectlarge public projects in Norway23. Tukel & Rom, 1998,
management reporting process nor they become partAnalysis of the Characteristics of Projects in diverse
of the historical project data" (Rad & Levin, 2002, p18).industries, Journal of Operations Management, Vol 16,
Belassi & Tukel (1996, p144) classified these factorspp43-6124. Turner & Muller, 2005, The project
into 5 distinct groups according to which element theymanager's leadership style as a success factor on
relate to:1. The project managerHaving a projectprojects, Project Management Institute, Vol. 36, No. 1,
manager is not going to guarantee the success of app 49-6125. Wideman, 1996, Improving PM: Linking
project. He must have a number of skills to use duringSuccess Criteria to Project Type, paper presented to
the project to guide the rest of the team tothe Southern Alberta Chapter, Project Management
successfully complete all the objectives. In the 2001Institute, Calgary SymposiumDimitris Litsikakis is
CHAOS report (The Standish Group International, 2001,currently studying MSc Project Management in one of
p6), business, communication, responsiveness, process,the top business schools in UK, Lancaster University.
results, operational, realism and technological skills areHe has published a series of articles in Ne.O (New
mentioned as some of the most important skills aTechnology Observer).
project manager should have to deliver success.