Strategic Human Resource Management and Knowledge Management

The use of strategic human resource management inthe stored information is never used (McDermott, 1999,
the management of knowledge can providep. 104). Personalisation refers to those strategies that
organisations with a significant competitive advantage.recognize that knowledge has a human aspect,
Strategic human resource management refers to thefocusing on recruiting and retaining knowledgeable
process of incorporating human resourcestaff, and fostering communication. While both
management systems and processes into thestrategies try to effectively control organisational
strategic management of an organisation (Wright,knowledge, codification tends to focus on getting
Dunford, & Snell, 2001). It is through the use ofinformation out of employees and into databases,
such strategies that organisations can foster innovationwhilst personalisation focuses on getting and keeping
and competitive advantage (Kazmi & Ahmad,key knowledgeable employees. Human resource
2001). However in order to harness the capabilities ofstrategies to influence knowledge management vary
organisational knowledge, it is necessary todepending on the knowledge management strategy
strategically manage that knowledge.chosen. For example, in performance management,
There is no simple definition of knowledge. Thecodification strategies call for short-term goals related
meaning of knowledge depends on both theto the amounts of information documented or stored
organisation and context (Alvesson, 1993). Knowledge(Edvardsson, 2008). In contrast, with personalisation
extends beyond information, into the realm of humanstrategies, goals are developmental rather than results
thinking. With information, humans are able to think,based, more long term, focusing on creativity and
process and share knowledge (Ardichvili & Seunginnovation. In reality, a combination of both strategies is
Won, 2009; McDermott, 1999). Without such a humanusually required (Petersen & Poulfelt, 2002). A
aspect, knowledge would be merely information.prime example of differences in these strategies is the
Knowledge management, therefore, is thedifference in recruitment strategies. With codification,
development and implementation of strategies torecruitment tends to be very formal, based on written
create, maintain and share knowledge, in order tojob descriptions, with a focus on testing and evaluating
achieve organisational goals (Edvardsson, 2008).candidates (Edvardsson, 2008). Conversely, a
Knowledge management is not a new concept, havingpersonalisation strategy involves a less formal, more
been discussed at least 30 years ago (Henry, 1975).subject approach to recruitment, where the focus is
Early research conducted into knowledgemore on determining whether candidates fit within the
management focused on the use of informationknowledge sharing culture of the organisation. These
technology concepts, designed to assist knowledgetheories tend to align with the research of Robertson
creation, capture and sharing (Edvardsson, 2008;and Hammersley (2000).
McDermott, 1999; Petersen & Poulfelt, 2002). AsRecent empirical research has further determined that
time has passed, an increasing amount of researchthe strategic human resource management of
has focused on the human element of knowledgeknowledge can improve the knowledge within
management. This paper focuses on progress of thatorganisations (Lopez-Cabrales, et al., 2009). Specifically,
human element, particularly theoretical and empiricalhuman resource systems allow organisations to
literature related to the link between strategic humandevelop and improve on employee knowledge, as well
resource management and knowledge management.as provide direction to employees to ensure the
Most knowledge management systems focus onknowledge is utilised to achieve organisational goals.
using information technology to capture, store, distributeThe use of a human resource strategy to manage
and make available information; this does little toknowledge contributes to the creation of unique
improve organisational knowledge. Information systemsknowledge; however Lopez-Cabrales, et al. suggest
focus on a singular aspect of knowledge, information,that there is no best practice for the use of human
failing to address the fact that knowledge, being theresource processes to manage knowledge. In some
result of human thinking, goes beyond mere informationways this research follows on from Wright, Dunford,
or data. McDermott (1999, p. 104) suggested that the& Snell (2001), who suggest that any competitive
use of information systems was "the great trap inadvantage does not stem from the human resource
knowledge management". Rather than solelysystems, but that the human resource systems
information systems, human resource systems andprovide a framework to store and communicate
information systems need to be combined to manageknowledge. They propose expanding the usual
knowledge. The best use of knowledge can be madeconcepts in human resources management processes
by focusing on the human aspect of knowledge, ratherto also encompass the organisational knowledge,
than the specific knowledge content itself. Developingthrough allowing human resources more input into a
communities in which knowledge if effectively andwide range of work processes.
efficiently shared drives innovation, resulting inHowever, it has been argued that perhaps regular
increased competitive advantage. McDermott furtherhuman resource practices are not relevant in modern
suggests that through planning the organisationalknowledge based organisations (Chasserio &
structure and culture with knowledge management inLegault, 2009; Minbaeva, Foss, & Snell, 2009;
mind, knowledge could be created, shared andRobertson & Hammersley, 2000). Chasserio
leveraged. A large amount of modern literature agrees& Legault (2009) go so far as to suggest that
that human elements are at least as important asstrategic human resource management may be
information systems to knowledge managemententirely irrelevant in some modrn, high technology
(Ardichvili & Seung Won, 2009; Edvardsson, 2008;companies. In studies of a variety of knowledge
Lopez-Cabrales, Pérez-Luño, & Cabrera,intensive organisations they discovered that few
2009).human resource management strategies and policies
Although the human factor in knowledge managementwere in place. Human resources is instead relegated to
is generally accepted, there are many alternativeoperational procedures, such as ensuring compliance
thoughts on integrating human resource managementwith industrial relations instruments. In organisations in
systems into knowledge management. Robertson andwhich this occurs, there is very little in the way of
Hammersley (2000) conducted exploratory researchhuman input into strategy. This lack of strategy
into human resources practices and knowledgeopposes research by Petersen and Poufelt (2002),
management within a single organisation. Thewho found that Knowledge management is most
organisation studied used few formal human resourceeffective in organisations where the knowledge
management practices, and it was found that themanagement strategy is precise and supported by the
employees were still motivated to share theirorganisational structure, culture and general business
knowledge. The organisation was also still highlystrategies. Chasserio & Legault speculate that the
competitive in the marketplace, despite the lack ofconcepts of commitment, such as those argued by
traditional human resource practices. The results ofHislop (2003) and others, require further analysis,
their research suggest that, in some knowledgeparticular with regard to highly skilled workers.
intensive organisations, regular human resourcesThe use of strategic human resource management to
strategies are inadequate or ineffective. Hislop (2003)manage knowledge is a newly established practice. A
posited that the reason the organisation studied bylarge amount of existing literature is theoretical in
Robertson and Hammersley had succeeded innature, and much empirical research is based on
knowledge management was the commitment ofstatistically insignificant samples or anecdotes. With the
employees to the organisation. Where employees arecurrent level of research the link between strategic
highly dedicated to their job and organisation,human resource management and knowledge
knowledge is shared organically without furthermanagement is largely context dependent. There are
managerial processes. In some cases, it is necessarymany areas within the field that would benefit from
to treat employees who work in knowledge intensivefurther longitudinal research. The impact of human
organisations differently to regular workers, possibly asresource management systems and processes on
they expect a deeper level of autonomy andknowledge management will be better understood
independence in their work (Robertson &through research into aspects such as the influence of
Hammersley, 2000). Rejecting regular human resourcejob design, organisational culture, career opportunities,
management practices and processes in favour ofand appraisal and reward systems. Additional research
informal, unofficial and subjective approaches tointo employee commitment will ensure that human
human resource management could lead to improvedresource strategies focus on the areas where most
performance. Edvardsson (2008) also found thatgains can be made, and have a minimal footprint
regular human resource management processes maywhere they are of little benefit. What is clear from the
need to be modified in knowledge intensiveresearch is that effective knowledge management
organisations, because those organisations are bycan and does deliver significant competitive advantage.
nature complex and irregular. Rigid processes such asWhere organisations are able to direct their knowledge
recruitment, performance management and rewardtoward innovation, competitive advantage will follow.
programs can limit knowledge sharing, stifling creativity, 
with a negative effect on competitive advantage.References
Petersen and Poulfelt (2002) agree that differentAlvesson, M. (1993). Organisations as rhetoric:
strategies are required, depending on the type ofknowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with
workers and organisational culture. Whilst the studyambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6),
was primarily focused on factors external to human997-1015.
resource strategies, it was also concluded thatArdichvili, A., & Seung Won, Y. (2009). Designing
performance management and incentive programsintegrative knowledge management systems:
contribute considerably to the success of knowledgetheoretical considerations and practical applications.
management. For strategies to create and storeAdvances in Developing Human Resources, 11(3),
knowledge to be successful, incentives and rewards307-319.
must be used to encourage both the creation andChasserio, S., & Legault, M.-J. (2009). Strategic
sharing of knowledge. For example, incentives forhuman resources management is irrelevant when it
documenting systems and processes should be usedcomes to highly skilled professionals in the Canadian
in conjunction with incentives for actually sharingnew economy. International Journal of Human
information with other workers. This concept has sinceResource Management, 20(5), 1113-1131.
been agreed by a number of other theorists andEdvardsson, I. R. (2008). HRM and knowledge
researchers (Edvardsson, 2008).management. Employee Relations, 30(5), 553-561.
Hislop (2003) suggests that knowledge managementHenry, N. (1975). Knowledge management:
has not fully employed human resource managementbureaucracy, technology, and knowledge management.
strategies and concepts. He further suggests that thePublic Administration Review, 35(6), 572-578.
level of commitment of employees to the organisationHislop, D. (2003). Linking human resource management
contributes directly to the effectiveness of knowledgeand knowledge management via commitment.
management, and that this may be attributable toEmployee Relations, 25(2), 182-202.
human resource management policies and processes.Kazmi, A., & Ahmad, F. (2001). Differening
Strategic management incorporating techniques toApproaches to Strategic Human Resource
motivate employees may contribute to commitment,Management. Journal of Management Research, 1(3),
ultimately driving competitive advantage. While much133.
literature focuses on the storage and sharing ofLopez-Cabrales, A., Pérez-Luño, A., &
knowledge, Hislop contends that the attraction andCabrera, R. V. (2009). Knowledge as a mediator
retention of employees may be just as important asbetween HRM practices and innovative activity.
knowledge sharing in the use of knowledgeHuman Resource Management, 48(4), 485-503.
management in fostering innovation. As modernMcDermott, R. (1999). Why Information Technology
organisations employ larger numbers of higher skilledInspired But Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management.
workers, they are at risk of losing those workers toCalifornia Management Review, 41(4), 103-117.
other organisations, or even being unable to recruitMinbaeva, D., Foss, N., & Snell, S. (2009). Bringing
those skilled workers at all. As such, it is vital thatthe knowledge perspective into HRM. Human
organisations develop strategies to manage humanResource Management, 48(4), 477-483.
resources with knowledge in mind. This includesPetersen, N. J., & Poulfelt, F. (2002). Knowledge
strategies to manage recruitment and selection to findmanagement in action: A study of knowledge
and hire new skilled workers, who will bring valuablemanagement in management consultancies. In A. F.
new knowledge. Without such strategies, even a smallBuono (Ed.), Developing Knowledge and Value in
turnover rate can quickly lead to a loss ofManagement Consulting (Volume 2): Research in
organisational knowledge.Management Consulting. Greenwich: Information Age
Attempting to integrate strategic human resourcePublishing.
management with knowledge management,Robertson, M., & Hammersley, G. O. M. (2000).
Edvardsson (2008) makes a clear delineation betweenKnowledge management practices within a
technical strategies and human based strategies,knowledge-intensive firm: the significance of the people
referring to them as codification and personalisation.management dimension. Journal of European Industrial
Codification strategies focus on structuring ofTraining, 24(2-4), 241.
knowledge systems such as databases to store andWright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001).
distribute information within an organisation. Critics ofHuman resources and the resource based view of the
codification strategies note that the information storedfirm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701.
lacks context, leading to "information junkyards", where