Spending Training Dollars Wisely. Management Leadership Training

Why You Should Throw Your Training Dollars Out thepeople feel worse in the process; perhaps even
Window!affecting performance in the opposite direction
In the course of my travels, I meet interesting businessintended. Let me be clear—it’s not just a question
people from around the world who want to build greatof just adding more dollars; it’s also a question of
companies. They say that people are their mostdesign. You need to ensure the design of the program
important asset. They say they will stop at nothing toyou are investing in builds follow-up into the learning.
improve the performance of their people. They sayA recent study of 86,000 people published in Strategy
they are ‘committed.’ Then they ask if we canand Business (Fall 2004) demonstrates how important
help them create ‘real change’ in a two-dayfollow-up is to any learning program. Eight major
leadership training program, see also And I tell them tocorporations from a wide range of industries
go fly a kite … well, not exactly.   (I guess we(pharmaceutical/health care, financial services,
wouldn’t have much of a business if I did that tooaerospace/defense and media to name a few)
many times!) assessed the ‘change in leadership
The point is that two days are simply not enough.effectiveness’ based on the amount of follow-up
Athletes get this—they understand that to change athat a co-worker received from the training program.
golf swing, a volleyball serve, or a quarterback’sThe results were astounding.
throwing mechanics, it requires more than a few daysWhen the co-worker did ‘a little follow-up,’ the
of focus. Pilots also get this—flight simulators werechange in leadership effectiveness improved.
created for a specific reason; to put these skilled  When the co-worker did “some follow-up,”
technicians in challenging situations so many times thatthe change in leadership effectiveness grew.
their reflex reactions become skilled and second  When the co-worker did ‘frequent
nature.follow-up,’ the change in leadership effectiveness
What athletes and pilots understand is that trainingbecame even more significant. And, finally, when the
without an ‘after-action review’ or ‘backco-worker did a “consistent or periodic
brief’ is useless. At IHHP, we call it ruthlessfollow-up,” the change in leadership effectiveness
accountability - something that holds you accountablewas the most significant of all groups.
to the change you are attempting to make.The results don’t lie. Following up after a program is
This concept is the same when managing a team orabsolutely critical if you want to see real change.
leading an organization: no follow-up after trainingTraining that begins and ends with only an event (the
equals no  sustained learning. Three critical steps are‘spray and pray technique’) breeds cynicism
required to achieve any significant change in behaviorand sabotages future attempts at learning. Quite
and performance in sport or business:simply, not very many people are self directed enough
1. focus over timeto be able to stay focused and make good on change
2. repetition, andafter a training program. I write from experience,
3. ruthless accountability.having worked with Olympic champions and top
It won’t work with two steps . . . and certainly notleaders.
with just one (e.g. “Budgets are tight and we haveEven this lofty group gets ‘tranquilized by the
only two days”).  If you miss any of these steps,trivial,’ finding it hard to stay focused on what
you might as well throw your training budget out thematters most in the midst of the many small details
window because it will be about as effective. Changethat bombard them on a daily basis. With no follow-up
that . . .  it will be more effective. Tossing your moneybuilt into a program, it is exceedingly difficult to make
out the window at least ensures that the followingthe initial investment of learning—the two
scenario (which occurs thousands of times a week indays—work for you.
hundreds of companies all over the world) doesn’tSo how do you build follow-up into training
actually happen: a group of people step into a roomprograms?  You start by getting out of the ‘event
for a few days to improve their leadership. Most arrivementality’ that pervades most organizations.
truly dedicated to learning. They receive feedbackDon’t spend all of your money on just one big
from their direct reports and peers and manageevent for the year. If you can’t increase your
themselves extraordinarily well to get the gift that thisbudget, work with a smaller number of individuals for at
feedback represents. They are inspired to improve.least six months beyond the event using coaching,
Then they leave.follow-up training or advanced technologies such as
Take John for example. The next day back this welle-learning.
intentioned manager is hit with three times his normalIf you really want to see learning beyond the event,
amount of emails. His manager calls him in and tells himperhaps the most significant thing you can do to
that they need to move faster on a key projectimprove leadership effectiveness is to get and keep
because of a change in budgets. A direct report walksyour co-workers involved. (After all, no one likes to be
by and seems distant for some unknown reason. asked for feedback and then be ignored.) Make it
Maybe he was the person who said I don’t spendclear to participants that they will be asked to initiate a
enough time with him in my feedback, he thinks. And,discussion with their colleagues, post-program, for the
of course there’s his daughter’s little leagueone thing they are trying to improve. Having
game tonight.  He absolutely will not miss one again -participants use the power of colleagues in the ruthless
although it’s not looking too good after meeting withaccountability process is a strong argument for
his manager.involving a coach. The study we mentioned earlier
By the following week, the intention to change is longfound that having an external or internal coach made a
forgotten. What remains is residue from the feedbacksignificant difference in helping participants drive
received from his closest colleagues and a deep,follow-up by colleagues.
aching feeling of, Who’s kidding who? I can’tThe bottom line is this:  don’t be too hard on
really change.  This of course affects a person’syourself if you feel like you haven’t been able to
sense of ‘self-efficacy’- the idea that they canmake real change following a training program. Maybe
set a goal and meet it.you’ve been set up for failure. Maybe your
Then, next year, after another training session, seeorganization just isn’t committed to real change;
also the same scenario is played out.maybe it’s merely lip service. Or maybe they just
The message to organizations interested in realdon’t know. There is a science to change. 
change is this:  if you’re not going to spend yourConsider it for your next training program. This will
training dollars wisely, save them. Wait until next year,leave your windows free to function as conduits of
double your budget and do it right. The band-aidscenic views and fresh air—a much better purpose,
approach is giving learning a bad name and makingdon’t you think?