Nissan North America Transforms HR Services

As part of the SSON HR series in association withexpenditures.That means we were spending more
Enwisen, SSON spoke to client Nissan about theirmoney than our peers. Since we have instituted the
North American HR Shared Services strategy andHR transformation, we are now in the top quartile,
how Enwisen played a pivotal role in cutting costs andspending the least amount of money compared with
adding value.our peers.
SSON: I would like to start by asking you to explainSSON: How long did it take you to achieve that?
Nissan North America's HR shared services strategy.Dwain: The overall transformation, if you think about it
Dwain Stevens: Our strategy was not just to developfrom start to finish, was probably a couple of years -
HR shared services, it was to transform humanmaybe two to three years - but the transformation to
resources throughout the entire company, to add morethe HR service center, which really saved the most
to the business. As part of that transformationmoney, was probably a year-and-a-half from start to
strategy, one of the end products was to developfinish. If you look at total analysis from implementation,
shared services, and the strategy for the sharedof the technology change, and the launch the service
services was to basically standardise all the HRcenter, that was about three to three-and-a-half
practices as much as possible throughout themonths. We did a few months prep work before that.
company, as well as remove any administrative asSSON: What were some of your key performance
well as transactional-type tasks from the HRindicators for measuring success? You have just
personnel within the different locations.explained cost-savings, but how are you tracking key
SSON: How have you leveraged technology toperformance indicators and how are you meeting
transform HR and effectively lower costs?them?
Dwain: In the past we didn't have an effective way toDwain: Our primary KPI's are call-center related, and
share information with all employees that wasthen service-related. For example, how quickly we
HR-centric. We had an employee intranet, but becauseanswer the phones - that's one KPI. The other KPI is
of the way that it was technically designed, all theto make sure that people don't abandon the call. So
employees didn't have access to it, just certainthe first KPI is service levels; the second KPI is
employees. So we needed technology, a dynamicabandonment rate. And then the other key measure is
employee portal, where we could put all kinds offirst contact resolution, which is an indication of
HR-related information, and make it available tocustomer service. On all those three primary KPIs, we
employees 24/7. That way, when people have aare at or above the world-class measures.
question, they can look for the answer themselves viaSSON: How many CSR's do you have serving your
any computer - and most of our employees do havepopulation of 12,000 employees?
computers, whether at work or at home. What's more,Dwain: How we are structured may be different to
if people needed to make some sort of change thatothers, because of what tasks that we're responsible
was HR or benefits-related related, they could gofor. We basically have three groups of people, and we
online, make those changes, themselves, and not havefollow the traditional tier terminology that many HR call
to wait for someone in HR to fill out the forms, entercenters use, or any kind of call center really does. Tier
that data, make that change and then see the changeZero is our HR knowledge base portal technology; Tier
take effect later on. Online access has improvedOne is the HR service center staff directly answering
everybody's lives - helping employees get thethe phones from employees. For us, Tier Two is our
information faster, due to the transactions being faster.benefits administrators, and then we have our COE's,
It has also eliminated a lot of duplicate entry andwhich is Tier Three. For Tier One - we have eight
non-value-added tasks from HR.people for 12,000 employees and we have two people
SSON: But you moved to a different technologyon nights, and although we might not get any calls at
platform, and what was the business case for doingnight we currently do it for employee relations.
that?We are a non-union company, and want to maintain
Dwain: The business case was to save money in athat, so we struck a balance between holding people's
much more efficient and effective way. We carriedhands and being available for people - that's why we
out an analysis to find out how a portal could help ushave the people at night. I would say this about having
do that or how can a shared services center could doa HR centralized service center: some people would
that. And we ran the numbers, and believed, -- andsay, 'well, you took a HR person away from us in the
have confirmed -- that it did make us more effectiveplant.' But what we really did, instead of one person
and much more efficient.being taken away from the plant, we added eight
SSON: What technology requirements did you choose,people available to you, basically twenty one hours a
and why did you choose them?day, five days a week. By adding eight customer
Dwain: Our technology requirements were anservice reps, we have more people available to take
employee portal that was available 24/7, and wasyour calls, so that improves customer service for
available to 100% of our employees. We wanted singleemployees.
sign-on capabilities, and we wanted it to be HR-centricSSON: Your self-service platform has obviously been
- in other words, we didn't want generic or standardquite effective, because if you can reduce it to eight
service center portal or call tracking technology. Wepeople responding to 12,000 employees, would you
wanted an integrated solution -- not two separateagree with that?
solutions that we would have to integrate ourselves.Dwain: Yes, I do, but it is hard to quantify how many
And, again, single sign-on capabilities, which then directlypeople get their questions answered from the
tie to our HRMS system - those were the primarytechnology. We know how many people access the
requirements. After extensive research, including lotstechnology, but we don't know how many people get
of analysis, and lots of demos, we chose the Enwisentheir questions answered by it. We do know, because
AnswerSource HR Service Delivery suite, because itof the technology dashboards, that the portal does get
met our technology requirements, and it was a greata lot of use. When people call the service center,
value.typically their questions are more complicated than just
SSON: Did you consider other technology providerssimple information, so that the length of calls is longer.
before Enwisen?That's ok with us; that's why we're here, to answer
Dwain: We did look at a lot of different technologythose complex calls. I will also say that our Tier One
providers. What made Enwisen stand out was thatpeople on the phones, do other things besides answer
they met all the technology requirements, and wecalls, because call volume is unpredictable, and there
were convinced that the speed of implementationare times when call volume is low. So we have taken
would be faster -- and the amount of work that ouradministrative tasks that can be done in between calls,
people would have to do was going to be much lessor we can take somebody off the phone to give them
because the vendor, Enwisen, would take that on. Wethe time to do these administrative tasks. By taking on
were up and running in less than three-and-a-halfadministrative tasks at Tier One, and it removes work
months.from other higher, more expensive Tier Two and
SSON: Fantastic, and what were the challenges inThree staff. And we have also centralized some of
moving to the new platform and integrating the newthose tasks that used to be done by the local
system?nationwide affiliates. So we are able to better utilize
Dwain: The main challenge that any organization facesour resources.
is change. Since we were basically transformingSSON: Are there any other metrics that you could
human resources, we were going to change the wayshare from the 'Win' HR project?
in which HR services were delivered throughout theDwain: Our service levels are in the mid eighties, so
entire company. It affected employees, the managers,that means that we're answering 84-85% of the calls
and especially the HR people. We found thatwithin sixty seconds or less. Then our average talk
communicating what we were doing, and when andtime is four-and-- half to five minutes. Our first contact
how, and doing it in a way that encouraged theresolution rate is not as high as I would like, but there is
employees to believe that it was going to be better fora factor in there that is beyond our control. Our first
the entire company worked best. That was one of thecontact resolution rate is when the rep is able to
major changes, because if you think about it, we wereanswer the first question at the first call: and that's in
going to change their jobs, what they did, where theythe low to mid eighties, anywhere between 82-84%
did it, and the technology that they used. We basicallytypically, sometimes higher. The reason it is not higher,
upset their entire world. And then from the employees'is that we have partnered with other groups that don't
perspective, they were used to seeing HR people,fall within the HR umbrella. For example, payroll does
more HR people in the facility answering theirnot fall under the HR umbrella, neither does a group of
questions, instead of looking for information on theirpeople called lease car, a benefit that we give our
own. So, through the technology we encouragedemployees. Because we don't have total access to
employees to do more for themselves. That was athe information that those groups do, and we're the
big challenge. Many people, including myself, likecenter point of contact, employees who call us with
somebody to hold my hand.payroll-related questions, or their lease car questions
SSON: Do you think you've mastered that now andrequire more time to research. And we're able to
has it been really accepted at ground level?answer those questions anywhere between 60-70%
Dwain: I think that it has definitely been accepted,of the time, first contact resolution. But that brings the
because I would say that while they don't have anyoverall score lower. If we took out lease car, and if we
choice but they still have the HR people in the affiliates.took out payroll, our first contact resolution would be
But what HR people are doing in the plants is veryover the mid nineties.
different to what they were doing before. And it is stillSSON: What other areas of HR do you see being
accepted because our call volume is still steady, and attransformed in the next two to three years?
times it grows. When we have HR initiatives, we do aDwain: From the service center perspective, even
very good job of communicating what those initiativesfrom day one after we launched - we went live in
are - it could be a simple benefits change, it could be aSeptember within three to four months - we started
massive benefits change, and it could bean initiative to change the way we provide health
communications from the CEO. So when wecoverage. Instead of the traditional PPO plan, we went
communicate to the employees, they will call theto a consumer-driven health plan, which is major
service center. The service center has become a hubchange for how healthcare is delivered. Within twelve
for many different types of initiatives when themonths the entire company was on this new CDHP
employees have questions. After the initialhealth plan. Now that amount of work took a
communication goes out, they direct the calls to thetremendous amount of time -- not just from our CEO,
service center, for those kinds of things, as long asbut from the service center, too, and we were able to
they are routine, and it has become much moredo that within a year. And this was with a newly
accepted.launched service center with new people and newly
SSON: What do you think are the major benefits oflaunched responsibilities and, we did that very
moving to the new platform? As well as integrating aeffectively.
multi-tier approach?So we have found ways to constantly standardize
Dwain: The major benefits affect different groups ofour processes, consolidate our policies, automate our
people differently. From an employee's perspective,processes, and streamline things -- in other words,
because we have a HR portal, a lot of HR-relatedmore ways of doing more with less. A good example
information - for example, policies, even cafeteriafor this is when we launched this new CDHP plan.
menus -- directly links into their pay system. They canWhen it came time for people to enroll -- it was a
see their payslips to vendors, can find all kinds ofmandatory enrollment for 13,000 employees at that
information, such as what do they do when they havetime -- and we were looking at how we were going to
a baby, get married, or just life events. With thattake the call volume, with eight reps, we considered
technology, it encourages people to help themselves.hiring more reps and even outsourcing the Tier One
People want information when they want it, and don'tcalls. It was estimated that we needed seventy people
want to have to wait for somebody else to provide it,to take all the calls based on our population and the
so it improves their quality of life.type of plan that was changing. Nissan is very frugal,
Then when it comes to transactions, there's less paperthat is part of our culture and we are very aggressive
to fill out. For example, they don't have to fill out theon cost, too.. So, we literally hired twenty-four people
piece of paper with the change form - they do it online.ourselves, trained them, gave them some intensive
So the problems of the form getting lost, or delaystraining on the new technology as well as the new
when somebody receives it to when somebodyplans, and then with the right tools, the right training and
enters that information, are gone. It speeds up thethe right time, they were able to take the new call
transactional process, from the employee'svolume with the new CDHP enrollment. And our
perspective.service levels, even though our call volume went up six
From HR perspective, since we removed thattimes the average of the norm, our service levels
administrative/transactional stage from some of thewere in the mid- nineties, with only twenty four
HR people, we're able to focus on different types ofadditional people -- which is a testimony to our people,
work. We have a group of people at the HR serviceas well as on how we did the training and how we
center that focus on the administration as well as thepartnered with our contractors but also a testimony to
transactional side, but we also partner in the servicethe technology that we used.
center with other groups of people, like the businessSSON: The automobile industry was very affected
affiliates, when they have a major change. We arethrough the recession., Have you seen any 'green
their partners in the administering the change, and weshoots' of recovery?
are partners with expertise when it comes to theDwain: Yes, HR really led the way in the re-engineering
conversation of benefits. Because we have datathe efforts; it started a couple of years ago. The
information, we know what the employees questionscompany has found ways of restructuring itself
are and we partner with them to share information towithout affecting too many people - we hardly had
say, 'here is what they like, here is what they don't like,'any layoffs, we had people that volunteered to leave,
and they're better able to come up with a betterand they were incentivized to do so. Because we
benefits change. And then from the businesswere very aggressive in our re-engineering efforts,
perspective, because we have become much moreand our cost cutting. Again, this is without massive
efficient, much more effective, we have saved money,forced lay-offs, so it put us in a position to save
and saved time. So, everybody wins: the employee,money. So we were able to turn around a profit -- I
HR and the business.think we lost it one quarter, and then we turned it
SSON: Dwain, how much you have saved sincearound the following quarter. So it couldn't have
integrating the system? Or can you put a percentagehappened without that aggressive re-engineering, not
on it?just within HR but from the other parts of the
Dwain: I think the amount of money that we savedorganization. In fact, our market share had gone up
would be confidential, but let me say this: when we didduring this recession, while othershave lost it. This is
the analysis of HR, we were in the bottom quartile ofwithout any government bail outs.