Human Resources Vs. "UN" Human Resources

Human Resources vs. "Un" Human ResourcesAnn Bogardus, states in her PHR/SPHR Study Guide
The momentary insensitivity of an HR professional canbook that by the middle of the twentieth century, the
set in motion a disastrous and a potentially harmfulpersonnel function was part of almost every business
chain of events for any business today. Taking aand thus in 1948 the personnel practitioners developed
closer look at what can happen when employeesinto a profession. Today, this profession is called
seek advice from their employer's HR department andHuman Resource Profession and plays key roles from
instead are treated as if they are a nuisance, canadministration to strategic partnerships. Hence, it
reveal that some "Un" human resource professionalsbehooves businesses to take a closer look at their HR
have managed to settle in positions for which theydepartments to assess if their "un" human resources
have no calling.  The reality of what we see in therepresentatives can be either properly trained and
news these days concerning workplace violence andcoached to serve in their respective roles or replaced
vengeance can lead one to wonder if the HRby professional "Human" Resources teams that can
representatives are abiding by the core values andprovide all aspects of HR while maintaining the "human"
professional HR code of ethics that can strategicallytouch necessary for the overall stability and safety of
minimize some of the employer tragic stories.their organizations.
Many companies of all sizes have HR departmentsIn consideration of how all the pieces of the Human
comprised of ordinary people who serve in manyResources fit together in the  realm of business and
different roles for the benefit of the organization'sorganizational growth, it becomes increasingly
growth and stability. The many facets of HR haveimportant to examine, assess, and determine  the
become difficult for people to understand when itbest solutions at least on an annually. A coherent
comes to functions and responsibilities. Some see allargument on the benefits of in-house vs. outsourcing
HR people as recruiters, some as administrators, andof the HR department can draw interesting
yet some as strategic business partners and legalconclusions. One sided views without proper
consultants available to help companies stay out of thequantifications is a dangerous precedent and
court room.  The variations are customizable to thequantification without the "human" element will produce
organizational structure and strategic measures.skewed and inconclusive results.
Nonetheless, people view HR as the one-stop shopTaking a serious look from both angles will allow
for employment issues, concerns, investigations, etc.organizations to view and decide on the best possible
The bottom line is more and more people look to HRsolutions that can improve their bottom line.
for advice and counsel. So, along with the responsibilityUnderstanding the importance of balancing the HR
to counsel the employer, the HR professionals need tofunctions in conjunction with the core values and
maintain the "human" approach when dealing withstrategic company goals can make all the difference in
employee concerns, complaints, and any other issuesthe world. Start your journey today by reaching out
that may come their way. Showing the employeethe HR professionals that can offer your organization
genuine care and concern should never be asking forthe tools needed for compliance with a winning edge
too much.  In these days, it is the best approach fromon the real "Human" Resources approach.
a "best practices" standpoint.