Human Resource Management-true Perspective Supported by UN

Human Resource Management-True perspectivehuman beings, certain instruments and tools put
Ever since the inception of organization there has beentogether for attainment of shared goals.
an undeniable interplay of the human functions and[1] Weber’s organization goes a step further to
“The Organization”. History bearssay “The main components of an organizing
evidence to organizational activity indicating knowledgeeffort also include detailed procedures and rules, a
of many ideas later expressed as “scientificclearly outlined organizational hierarchy, and mainly
management”. Archaeology has unearthedimpersonal relationship between organization
extensive accumulations of relics from past civilizationsmembers”. Its fundamentals are the same as
that reflect elaborate organizational achievements. Therecognized by the early organization theorists. . Four
mammoth walls of ancient Babylon, the Pyramids offundamental ingredients are the qualifying organs of
the Pharons , Temples of Aztecs , and most Mughalany organization. The modern organizations may have
Architecture rival the accomplishments of the modernhundreds of sub factors but they will always be
industrial technology. Hannibal’s Crossing of thefounded on these original ones. It is therefore
Alps in 218 B.C with troops and equipment was aestablished that without the deliberate and planned
remarkable organizational feat.participation of humans, an organization doesn’t
19th century industrial revolution gave birth to theexist.
intentional and deliberate organization. Having reachedOver a period of time various types and categories of
inertia in the initial speedy production the managersorganizations have come up to suit the requirements
soon found out that it was the absence of deliberateof organizers and planners, but essentially all of these
man management that was marring the progress.belong to three basic categories.
They set about managing the human resources , inUnited Nations Stance on HRM
order to get the best out of them. It was here that aOver time the United Nations have come to more
firm and unbreakable link was discovered between thegenerally support the developing nations’ point
person and the organization. It was superiorof view, and have requested significant offsetting
organization with its deep consideration of the human“foreign aid” contributions so that a
resource that has given a clear edge to the westerndeveloping nation losing human capital does not lose
countries.the capacity to continue to train new people in trades,
Recent Global Trends in HRMprofessions, and the arts including all sectors of
The term human resource is variously defined inprofessional advancement.
political economy and economics, where it wasThe debate regarding “human resources”
traditionally called labor, one of three factors ofversus human capital thus in many ways echoes the
production. Its use within corporations continues todebate regarding natural resources versus natural
define common conceptions of the term.capital. An extreme version of this view is that
Modern analysis emphasizes that human beings arehistorical inequities such as African slavery must be
not predictable commodity “resources”compensated by current developed nations, which
with definitions totally controlled by contract, but arebenefited from stolen “human resources”
creative and social beings that make contributionsas they were developing. This is an extremely
beyond “labor” to a society and tocontroversial view, but it echoes the general theme of
civilization. The broad term human capital has evolvedconverting human capital to “human
to contain the complexity of this term, and inresources” and thus greatly diminishing its value
macroeconomics the term “firm-specific humanto the host society, i.e. “Africa”, as it is put
capital” has evolved to represent the originalto narrow imitative use as “labor” in the
meaning of term “human resources”.using society.
Advocating the central role of “humanIn the very narrow context of corporate “human
resources” or human capital in enterprises andresources”, there is a contrasting pull to reflect
societies has been a traditional role of socialist parties,and require workplace diversity that echoes the
who claim that value is primarily created by theirdiversity of a global customer base. Foreign language
activity, and accordingly justifies a larger claim ofand culture skills, ingenuity, humor, and careful listening,
profits or relief from these enterprises or societies.are examples of traits that such programs typically
Critics say this is just a bargaining tactic, which grewrequire. It would appear that these evidence a general
out of various practices of medieval European guildsshift to the human capital point of view, and an
into the contemporary trade union and collectiveacknowledgement that human beings do contribute
bargaining unit.much more to a productive enterprise than
A contrary view, common to capitalist parties, is that it“work”: they bring their character, their
is the infrastructure capital and (what they call)ethics, their creativity, their social connections, and in
intellectual capital owned and fused bysome cases even their pets and children, and alter the
“management” that provides most valuecharacter of a workplace. The term corporate culture
in financial capital terms. This likewise justifies ais used to characterize such processes.
bargaining position and a general view thatAn important controversy regarding labor mobility
“human resources” are interchangeable.illustrates the broader philosophical issue with usage of
A significant sign of consensus on this latter point is thethe phrase “human resources”:
ISO 9000 series of standards, which requires agovernments of developing nations often regard
“job description” of every participant in adeveloped nations that encourage immigration or
productive enterprise. In general, heavily unionized“guest workers” as appropriating human
nations such as France and Germany have adoptedcapital that is rightfully part of the developing nation and
and encouraged such descriptions especially withinrequired to further its growth as a civilization. They
trade unions. One view of this trend is that a strongargue that this appropriation is similar to colonial
social consensus on political economy and a goodcommodity fiat wherein a colonizing European power
social welfare system facilitates labor mobility andwould define an arbitrary price for natural resources,
tends to make the entire economy more productive,extracting which diminished national natural capital.
as labor can move from one enterprise to another[1] . Max Weber , The Theory of Social and Economic
with little controversy or difficulty in adapting.Organisation , New York , Oxford University Press ,
HRM and Organization – An Inter relationshipP337.
In its most primitive sense, organization is a body of