How to Monitor Employee Performance

Monitoring involves conducting periodic checks toservices.
determine an employee's level of performance in(6) Noting and investigating complaints and
relation to established performance standards.commendations.
Monitoring provides the data by which performance isSome monitoring will be ongoing, designed to detect
ultimately evaluated. It is important for the supervisor toperformance problems in the early stages. This might
monitor the employee's performance, not only to beinvolve, for example, checking work samples or
able to conduct the performance evaluation itself, butobserving employee activities several times a day or
also to be able to reinforce good performance orseveral times a week. Other monitoring may be at
attempt to improve unsatisfactory performance soonmore widely spaced intervals, either regular monthly or
after it occurs.quarterly reviews, or on an occasional random basis.
Ideally, the nature and frequency of monitoring shouldGenerally, new job or task performance requires more
be proposed by the employee. In this case, thefrequent monitoring than recurring work done by an
employee will have ownership of the process. It makesexperienced worker, as does follow-up monitoring of
a big difference to the supervisor-employeeless than satisfactory performance.
relationship if the employee proposes that theTo allow the supervisor to effectively counsel and
supervisor simply show up to observe performanceappraise the employee, monitoring should be exact and
(say, in a customer service setting). Then when thethe results should be recorded. However, this
supervisor appears, the employee will understand andmonitoring should focus on the performance of the
accept the supervisor's presence.key responsibilities for which performance standards
However, if the supervisor unilaterally decides tohave been established.
observe the employee's performance without anyMonitoring should be conducted throughout the
preliminary discussion, there is a strong possibility thatevaluation period, with the supervisor noting observed
the employee could perceive the supervisor'semployee performance that meets, exceeds, or falls
presence as harassment.short of the established level for acceptable
As a result, if there is some reason why the employeeperformance. The supervisor can then review these
should not be involved in determining the monitoringnotations at the end of the evaluation period to make
plan, it is still imperative that the supervisor advise thean evaluation of the employee's general performance
employee.of each of the key responsibilities.
Monitoring can take several forms, depending upon theSupervisors should communicate the purpose and
nature of the performance that is being appraised.intended frequency of planned monitoring activities to
Wherever possible, it makes sense to use existingthe employees. The emphasis of the monitoring should
systems that will not add work steps for either thebe on the improvement of an employee's
employee or the supervisor. Some monitoringperformance, not on trying to "trip up" the employee to
approaches include:show the employee in a bad light. If poor performance
(1) Reviewing work, either total output or samples.is the issue, and counseling and remedial training have
(2) Observing employee work activities.not been effective, then the supervisor should initiate
(3) Reading reports, charts, time sheets, work records,progressive discipline rather than maintaining a frequent
or logs, etc.monitoring review that could be construed as
(4) Self-reporting on progress by the employee.harassment.
(5) Surveying other units, the public, or clients of the