Developing a Leadership Training Program For High Potentials - A Case Study

Given the number of baby boomers expected to retireco-workers of the high potentials (anonymously via an
between now and 2030 (the last group of babyonline survey), their direct managers, and members of
boomers reach of the age of 65 in 2030, and, ofthe senior leadership team to get their perspective of
course, some may choose to work past age 65),the strengths and weaknesses of these individuals.
organizations need to prepare others to take overThey gathered data from performance reviews, past
leadership roles.  Some organizations will likely sourceprojects they worked on, and looked at the roles and
externally to fulfill leadership roles within theresponsibilities they had within the organization.  They
organization. However, many other organizationsalso reviewed in detail areas where the high potentials
realize that it may be better to move individuals intotook the initiative to make improvements and/or get
these roles who already understand the business andthings accomplished - in other words, opportunities they
have already been working in the organization.  And,found to take a leadership role.
certainly, a combination may occur whereLet me step back a moment, these individuals who
organizations promote from within and look to fill somehad been identified as high potentials had worked for
roles from external. These organizations who arethe organization for a minimum of 8 years and some
interested in recruiting from within will look to identifyas long as 15 years. There were individuals who had
"high potentials" already working within the organizationdeveloped an understanding of the workings of the
in a variety of roles. company as a whole.  They were those individuals
High potentials are often identified as those individualsyou would find pitching in to help out regardless of the
who have the potential to grow into leadership rolesproject in order to ensure the company reached its
within the organization.  They are hard workinggoals.  They were all strong problem solvers and
individuals who have the potential to be leaders basedwere driven individuals. And, they were passionate
on their knowledge, skills, and the behaviors andlearners - learning all they can - frequently on their own
attitudes they display.  They are high achievers within- to understand the company.
the organization - willing to do what is necessary toThe Leadership Development Training Program
get the job done. They are eager to learn new skillsXYZ Widget, based on their research and the data
and take on additional responsibilities and biggerthey gathered, determined that there would be
challenges. courses that every high potential individual would
There are many examples of companies that haveattend together as a group and then they would
successful leadership training programs in place, suchbranch off to attend training specific to a particular
as Bank of America, General Electric, Microsoft, Philipfunction area.  The leadership program would run
Morris, Novartis International, and Marriott International -over approximately a two year time period and was
to name just a few.  These organizations have seencomprised of the following sessions:
the value of ensuring that their high potentialAll participants took the following workshops over a
employees are groomed for future leadership roles.one year time period:
Successful organizations know what skills are required- Business acumen
for a leader to be effective for the organization to- Financial management
meet its long term strategic goals and grow and- Decision making/problem solving
prosper.  For example, many effective leaders have- Strategic planning
the following strengths:- Influencing
- Coaching others- Coaching
- Influencing skills- Long term vision/goal setting
- Collaborative decision making and problem solving- Team leadership
- Team leadershipThen, participants took additional workshops specific to
- Communicationtheir functional area over 6 - 12 months after the initial
- Long term vision/goal setting and the ability toprogram was completed.
communicate that to the organizationSales Function
- Financial management- Competitive analysis
- Strategic planning- Solutions selling HR/Admin Function
- Strategic thinking- Interviewing and selection skills
- Creative thinking- Policies and procedures
- Critical thinking- Basic law Product Marketing/Customer Service
- Adaptability/flexibilityFunction
- Risk taking- Customer analysis
- Business acumen- Market analysis Manufacturing Function
- Change management- Lean manufacturing
Organizations may choose to look at their best leaders- Business process management Finance Function
and use those competencies they have identified in- Advanced financial management
those specific individuals to determine what they- Budgeting and monetary control Planning and
expect/need from their high potential employees inProcurement Function
order to develop a leadership training program that- Purchasing
meets their professional and personal needs and helps- Negotiating
the company meet its long term objectives, which- Supply chain management Quality Control Function
includes having individuals in place and ready to take on- Quality management
senior leadership roles within the organization. An- Auditing
assessment should be done of the high potential- ISO 9001 Materials Management Function
employees to determine their current strengths and- Inventory control
development needs. - Supply chain management
Any skills that are not needed or used now by theThe program then wrapped up with formal mentoring
senior leadership team, but may be used at a latercomponent.  The mentoring program supported all
time, should be considered when developing theleadership development participants at the end of their
leadership training program.  For an example, let'sprogram.
assume that the organization is currently doingPrior to the start of the program, preparation work
business throughout the United States; however, thewas required. This included what the individual
Board of Directors would like to see the organizationexpected to achieve from the program (their goals
grow and do business internationally.  Your upcomingand objectives), how they intended to use their new
leaders will need to understand how to do businessskills and knowledge and some required reading.
internationally - international laws and regulations forThroughout the program, and in between sessions,
doing business in various countries, cultural differences,participants were assigned projects to lead and had to
the ability to gauge the market overseas includingcomplete required readings.   Additionally, they were
identifying market for product or services and therequired to put together strategic plans as to how the
competition, developing overseas offices, leadingspecific functional area they were assigned to might
virtually, etc.  These additional needed skills and abilitiesdevelop and grow in the future.  Assessments were
should be part of any effective training program fordone throughout the two year program to gauge
the high potentials and should be part of anyincreases in skills and knowledge.
assessment to determine if an individual has theAll graduates of the program were assigned mentors
potential to be a senior leader within the organizationfrom their specific functional area.  These mentors
given these future needs.were executives in those areas and had agreed to
Let's look at a case study of a manufacturingparticipate in a formal mentoring program to groom
company that saw the need for a leadershipjunior high potential employees to take on executives
development program for their high potentialroles in the future.  Mentoring was a required
employees.  We'll look at how they determined whatcomponent of the executive's role and formal
competencies were needed for future leaders andmentoring plans were submitted to learning and
what comprised the program that was developed. development and monitored regularly for progress.
We'll also look at how additional individuals wereHow Additional Participants Were Selected
selected to attend the program.In addition to the already-identified high potential
Case Study: XYZ Widget Manufacturing Corporationemployees, the learning and development group held a
Background Informationnomination to include others in the training program with
XYZ Widget Manufacturing Corporation has been inlong-term potential. The nomination process included:
business since the early 1980's manufacturing widgets- A nomination form for managers and executives to
for both business-to-business andnominate individuals within the organization to
business-to-consumer sales.  The following functionalparticipate in the training program, including answering:
areas exist within XYZ Widget: Finance, HR/Admin,- Why the individual is a good candidate for the
Sales, Customer Service, Planning & Procurement,program (examples required)
Materials Management, Manufacturing, and Quality- What the individual will achieve from the program and
Control.  Of those 8 functional areas, 5 of them arehow the individual's attendance will benefit XYZ
led by senior executives who are in their 60s andWidget
expected to retire within the next 3 - 5 years.  TheA process for review of the nomination forms by a
other 3 are led by senior executives in their mid-50s. variety of managers, leaders, and directors within XYZ
There is no planned retirement date for them, but theWidget, from across all functional areas
Board of Directors for XYZ Widget wants to beAn interview process for candidates who were
prepared. selected from the nominations
To that end, the Board of Directors has asked theA selection process based on the results of interviews
company to start thinking about succession planning. of the candidates
How will they fill the leadership roles at each of theA total of 30 individuals went through the initial pilot
functional areas?program - 20 considered high potentials and 10 others
Determining Competencieswho were selected from nominations (of 35 total
The learning and development group at XYZ Widgetnominated).  Two programs were run simultaneously -
interviewed each of the current members of thewith 15 participants per program.   
leadership time (across all functions) to determine whatWrap Up
skills they believed were required to be effective inThe program ended up taking almost 3 years to
their roles.  These interviews were done in person,complete due to scheduling issues.
one-on-one.25 of the 30 participants completed the program in its
The group also met with the Board of Directors toentirety, some of those were assigned mentors during
understand their vision for the company and theirthe program (rather than at the end as planned) to
expectations of the next group of leaders.  Thisprovide them additional support in getting through the
meeting was done with all of the Board of Directors inprogram.  The company determined that some of the
small groups. individuals who were not considered part of the high
Additionally, they surveyed, on-line and anonymously,potential group but rather were nominated and
other individuals in management roles to get theirselected might actually be a better fit for an executive
perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of theleadership role over the previously identified high
current leadership team and what they believed werepotential employee. Of the 5 who did not complete the
needed for future leaders given the direction theprogram, 1 of them quit for another job, and 2 of them
company was heading. dropped out of their own volition as they decided that
All interviews were confidential.  The data gatheredthe workload was more than they wanted to commit
was used to determine what competencies (skills andto at this point.  The other 2 were released from the
behaviors) were required for future leaders.program because they did not complete required
Additionally, external research was gatheredassignments and had very limited participation. 
conducted about a variety of companies in the sameReferences
and similar industries to determine what were generallyThe Leadership Pipeline: How to Build the
considered as key skills and knowledge forLeadership-Powered Company, Authors: Ram Charan,
executives. Stephen Drotter, James Noel; Publisher: Jossey-Bass,
The learning and development group also interviewed2001
in depth each of the individuals initially identified as highSuccession: Are You Ready?
potentials in the company.  They also interviewed the