Building a Successful Business Through People

Several years ago my spouse and I built our secondintended to enhance employees' knowledge, skills,
new home. It is a process that we greatly enjoy inabilities, and to provide mechanisms through which
spite of the fact that it can be more than a littleemployees can use those attributes in performing their
stressful. When building a new home there are a lot ofroles. The second scale measured employee
decisions to be made. These decisions includemotivation and was comprised of practices designed
selecting a builder, a floor plan, the type of exterior youto recognize and reinforce desired employee
want (brick, siding, stucco, for example), selecting yourbehaviors. These practices included using formal
flooring, fixtures, and lighting, and on and on it goes.performance appraisals, linking those appraisals tightly
Some people prefer to buy an existing home becausewith employee compensation, and focusing on merit in
they find this plethora of decisions overwhelming.promotion decisions. The study assessed the effects
However, my spouse and I prefer making theseof management practices on turnover, sales per
decisions ourselves so that we can get exactly whatemployee (a measure of productivity), and the firm's
we want and so we can watch our empty lot beratio of stock market to book value. Huselid also
transformed into a home.included in his analysis a large number of potential
One of the advantages to building your own home isalternative explanations for the results, such as size,
that you can directly and easily observe the qualitycapital intensity, concentration ratio of the firm's
going into it. Our first area of concern is the foundation.industry, research and development expenditures as a
After our foundation is poured we look at it to assessproportion of sales, among others. He used statistical
whether it looks level and is free of any defects. Wetechniques in order to better assess the direction of
all know that a good foundation is critical. Without it, thecausality in order to determine whether performance
quality of the rest of the construction can be irrelevant.was driving management practices or management
Once we have a good foundation in place, wepractices were affecting performance. In addition,
continue to monitor the construction. We take note ofHuselid employed statistical procedures to overcome
the quality of the materials being used as well assample selection bias.
quality of the framing job, plumbing, drywall, etc. OnceThe results were both statistically significant and
the construction is completed and the buyers movesubstantively important for both scales assessing
into the house, the builder's job is finished but themanagement practices. The magnitude of the returns
homeowner's job is really just beginning because thefor investment in high performance work practices
house has to be maintained.was substantial. A one standard deviation increase in
Building a business is similar to building a house. Yousuch practices was associated with a 7.05 percent
need a good foundation. We've probably all known ofdecrease in turnover and, on a per employee basis,
businesses that were lacking in this crucial factor. The$27,044 more in sales and $18,641 more in market
first heavy storm that comes along wipes them out.value and $3,814 more in profits. A subsequent study
Although a good foundation is vital, alone it is insufficientof 702 firms, using a conception of the human
for business growth. The quality of our products andresource management system that was even more
or services is also important. However, we can have acomprehensive, found even larger economic benefits
great foundation, a great product or service, and still failwith a one standard deviation improvement in the HR
to thrive. Why? Because there is another essentialsystem index being associated with an increase in
element. What is it?shareholder wealth of $41,000 per employee. Similar
People.results have also been found in firms operating outside
In an article titled "Putting people first for organizationalthe United States.
success," published in the Academy of ManagementSo, we know that investing in people is an effective
Executive, Jeffrey Pfeffer and John Veiga discuss theway of building our business and increasing profits, but
imperative role that people play in business success.exactly how is this done? In his book, Pfeffer identifies
Over a decade's worth of studies within and acrossseven dimensions that characterize most of the
disciplines has shown that enormous economic returnssystems producing profits through people. They include:
are obtained through the implementation of practices1. Employment security.
that put people first. Their review of these studies has2. Selective hiring of new personnel.
led Pfeffer and Veiga to conclude that an irrefutable3. Self-managed teams and decentralization of
business case can be made that the culture anddecision making as the basic principles of organizational
capabilities of an organization, derived from the way itdesign. 4. Comparatively high compensation contingent
manages its people, are the real and enduring sourceson organizational performance.
of competitive advantage. They recommend that5. Extensive training.
managers take seriously the often heard adage that6. Reduced status distinctions and barriers, including
"people are our most important asset."dress, language, office arrangements, and wage
According to Pfeffer and Veiga, some organizations indifferences across levels.
today's competitive market, rather than putting their7. Extensive sharing of financial and performance
people first, have sought solutions to competitiveinformation throughout the organization.
challenges in places and means that have not beenAlthough some of these may seem contradictory to
very productive, treating their businesses as portfoliosconventional wisdom, research and experience have
of assets to be bought and sold in an effort to find thefound they can be very effective in increasing profits.
right competitive niche, downsizing and outsourcing in aHowever, as with any type of effort to improve
futile attempt to shrink or transact their way to profit,organizational effectiveness, these have to be
and doing a myriad of other things that weaken orimplemented in the right way. Take for example,
destroy their organizational culture in efforts toemployment security. No matter what the perceptions
minimize labor costs. However, there is a substantialare of upper management, if for some reason
and rapidly expanding body of evidence thatemployees do not perceive their jobs as secure, any
demonstrates the strong connection between howmeasures in place to provide security are ineffective.
firms manage their people and the economic resultsProviding extensive training is another potential problem
they achieve. Pfeffer and Veiga report that thisarea. Numerous training opportunities may be available,
evidence is drawn from studies of the five yearbut are they the right opportunities? Is the company
survival rates of initial public offerings; studies ofoffering the type of training employees need to be
profitability and stock prices in large samples ofmore effective at their jobs? How can upper
companies from a multitude of industries. They reportmanagement know the answers to these questions?
that substantial additional profitability and stock priceResearch.
gains, on the order of 40 percent, can be obtained byLet's return to our home-building analogy. Once
implementing high performance management practices.construction is finished and the homebuyers moves in,
In his book, The Human Equation, Jeffrey Pfefferit is up to them to maintain the home and property.
answers the question of how substantial benefits inThink of research as part of a maintenance process.
profits, quality, and productivity can occur simply byWhenever organizations make changes in order to
implementing high-commitment management practices.increase effectiveness, it takes some time to see
He identifies three reasons for the connectionresults. Let's say we are looking to changes in profit
between how people are managed and profitablemargins to determine whether our measures are
results:effective. By the time we are able to obtain this
1. People work harder, because of the increasedinformation, we may have been proceeding with
involvement and commitment that comes from havingineffective strategies for quite some time. Conducting
more control over and say in their work.employee research can help us to much more quickly
2. People work smarter; high performancedetermine whether we are on the right track. Getting
management practices encourage the building of skillsregular feedback (I recommend once a year) from
and competence and facilitate the efforts of people inemployees can enlighten you as to their perceptions
actually applying their wisdom and energy to enhancingregarding whether they feel secure in their jobs,
organizational performance.believe they have access to the training they need to
3. High commitment management practices, by placingdo their jobs well, and many other variables. This
more responsibility in the hands of people farther downinformation can be used to tweak processes put in
in the organization, save on administrative overhead asplace or may reveal the need to develop new
well as other costs associated with having anprograms if results indicate some are ineffective.
alienated work force in an adversarial relationship withIn addition, it is important to keep in mind that
management.employees are not the only "people asset" of our
High performance management practices do not workbusinesses, our customers are also key. It is essential
because of some mystical process, rather they workto keep current on the perceptions of your customers
because the set of practices is grounded in soundto ensure that their views of your products and
social science principles that have been shown to beservices are favorable. Once again, I recommend
effective by a great deal of evidence.surveying at least once a year, but the top producing
This fact was demonstrated in an award-winningcompanies I work with typically survey their customers
study conducted by Mark Huselid. The study includedquarterly. By staying aware of the current perceptions
almost a thousand senior human resourcesand attitudes of employees and customers, you can
professionals from all major industries. Two scalesbecome aware of potential problem areas before
were constructed from the survey responses. Thethey have a negative effect on your profits and make
first was called "employee skills and organizationala preemptive strike to correct your course.
structures," and included a broad range of practices