‘Best practice' as a human resource strategy

IntroductionBest practice as a human resource and development
Best practice as a human resource and developmentstrategy attempts to link two issues i.e. human
strategy attempts to link two issues i.e. humanresource strategies and competitive advantage. This
resource strategies and competitive advantage. Thisperspective is founded on the belief that human
perspective is founded on the belief that humanresource and development strategies can cause
resource and development strategies can causeemployees to become committed and highly motivated
employees to become committed and highly motivatedtowards their organisation. Consequently, such
towards their organisation. Consequently, suchemployees are expected to contribute towards
employees are expected to contribute towardsimprovement of the company's performance. Reward
improvement of the company's performance. Rewardsystems form a critical part of best practice policy
systems form a critical part of best practice policybecause they still fall under human resource strategies.
because they still fall under human resource strategies.The organisation to be examined is John Lewis
The organisation to be examined is John LewisPartnership. This company is a worker co-op. It is one
Partnership. This company is a worker co-op. It is oneof the most exemplary companies when it comes to
of the most exemplary companies when it comes toimplementation of best practice strategies. This is
implementation of best practice strategies. This isbecause all the employees within the organisation are
because all the employees within the organisation arepart owners of the organisation. The organisation
part owners of the organisation. The organisationfocuses on addressing all their needs whether in the
focuses on addressing all their needs whether in thereward section or elsewhere. On the other hand, the
reward section or elsewhere. On the other hand, theemployees pay back these efforts through
employees pay back these efforts throughcommitment and best performance. Best practice has
commitment and best performance. Best practice hasformed one of the organisation's key strengths.
formed one of the organisation's key strengths.Strategic capability and degree of sophistication of the
Strategic capability and degree of sophistication of thestrategic Human resource and development effort
strategic Human resource and development effortJohn Lewis partnership has made sure that training is
John Lewis partnership has made sure that training ispart of its human resource and development efforts.
part of its human resource and development efforts.This is because it realises the value of this best
This is because it realises the value of this bestpractice strategy. Pfeffer and Velga (1999) explain the
practice strategy. Pfeffer and Velga (1999) explain theimportance of training and development of skills within
importance of training and development of skills withinany organisation. A company that takes its employees
any organisation. A company that takes its employeesthrough training solidifies their contribution to the
through training solidifies their contribution to thecompany. This is because such employees get
company. This is because such employees getequipped with the ability to make decisions in their
equipped with the ability to make decisions in theirwork. On top of this, such employees have high levels
work. On top of this, such employees have high levelsof initiative and will try their utmost best to improve
of initiative and will try their utmost best to improvetheir organisational contribution. Skill development is a
their organisational contribution. Skill development is acharacteristic part of the John Lewis Partnership
characteristic part of the John Lewis Partnershipbecause employees who feel the need to improve
because employees who feel the need to improvetheir skills are given opportunities to do so through
their skills are given opportunities to do so throughtraining schemes.
training schemes.Youndt et al (1996) emphasise that training is one of
Youndt et al (1996) emphasise that training is one ofthe most fundamental aspects of best practice
the most fundamental aspects of best practicemodels. However, these same authors also add that
models. However, these same authors also add thattraining should be integrated into other development
training should be integrated into other developmentactivities like staffing, job rotation and others. They
activities like staffing, job rotation and others. Theyclaim that no amount of training will contribute towards
claim that no amount of training will contribute towardsorganisational development if employees are not
organisational development if employees are notgranted the permission to practice those acquired skills.
granted the permission to practice those acquired skills.This means that an organisation should try its best to
This means that an organisation should try its best togrant work autonomy to its employees and to
grant work autonomy to its employees and toempower them through training. John Lewis has
empower them through training. John Lewis hasachieved this very well. In other retail companies, line
achieved this very well. In other retail companies, linemanagers are given minimal responsibilities. Most of
managers are given minimal responsibilities. Most ofthem are expected to consult with higher authorities in
them are expected to consult with higher authorities inorder to decide on issues. However, the company
order to decide on issues. However, the companyunder study has eliminated that problem by training
under study has eliminated that problem by trainingthose members of staff (so that they can have
those members of staff (so that they can havenecessary skills) and then allowing them to make
necessary skills) and then allowing them to makeindependent decisions. They believe that this is a form
independent decisions. They believe that this is a formof investment into human capital since most of these
of investment into human capital since most of theseemployees feel valued.
employees feel valued.According to the Classical and Human relations
According to the Classical and Human relationsapproach, an organisation's structure and operation are
approach, an organisation's structure and operation areaffected by certain situational factors such as
affected by certain situational factors such astechnology, size and environment. However best
technology, size and environment. However bestpractice advocates like Burnes (2000) came up with a
practice advocates like Burnes (2000) came up with acontingency theory. He believes that a reward system
contingency theory. He believes that a reward systemwithin any company can affect the way it operates or
within any company can affect the way it operates orhow it is structured. Pfeffer (1994) believes that best
how it is structured. Pfeffer (1994) believes that bestpractice companies should have a structure that
practice companies should have a structure thatplaces staff members into groups. Those groups
places staff members into groups. Those groupsshould be such that they have the ability to make their
should be such that they have the ability to make theirown decisions. Another aspect of best practise firms
own decisions. Another aspect of best practise firmsis that they ought to have reward systems that are
is that they ought to have reward systems that arecompact in nature. This implies that there should be
compact in nature. This implies that there should beminimal differences between different members of
minimal differences between different members ofstaff so that most employees within the organisation
staff so that most employees within the organisationoperate in a relatively independent manner with the
operate in a relatively independent manner with theability to make their own decisions. John Lewis'
ability to make their own decisions. John Lewis'strategic capability in this aspect of structure is
strategic capability in this aspect of structure isdemonstrated by the division of the company into
demonstrated by the division of the company intodepartments. These departments work together to
departments. These departments work together toachieve gaols and have been granted relative
achieve gaols and have been granted relativeautonomy. One can consider them as teams. Also, the
autonomy. One can consider them as teams. Also, thecompany gives almost equal rewards to all members
company gives almost equal rewards to all membersof the teams. One can therefore conclude that the
of the teams. One can therefore conclude that thecompany's structure is a clear depiction of its best
company's structure is a clear depiction of its bestpractise strategy. (Pfeffer, 1994)
practise strategy. (Pfeffer, 1994)Why and whether human resource strategy is seen
Why and whether human resource strategy is seenas adding value
as adding valueBest practice strategies have definitely added value to
Best practice strategies have definitely added value tothe organisation. This is because the approach has
the organisation. This is because the approach hasmotivated performance within the organisation.
motivated performance within the organisation.According to the Equity and expectancy theories
According to the Equity and expectancy theories(main components of the best practice model) put
(main components of the best practice model) putforward by Adam (1965). It can be seen that there are
forward by Adam (1965). It can be seen that there aretwo aspects in motivation. The first is the input made
two aspects in motivation. The first is the input madeby an employee and the second is outcome which
by an employee and the second is outcome whichnormally comes from the respective organisation. The
normally comes from the respective organisation. Theratio between these two aspects needs to be equal
ratio between these two aspects needs to be equalotherwise employees will loose motivation to perform.
otherwise employees will loose motivation to perform.This is where the term negative inequity stems from.
This is where the term negative inequity stems from.Here, an employee's input is not matched to outcome
Here, an employee's input is not matched to outcomefrom the organisation. There is a need for justice to be
from the organisation. There is a need for justice to beadministered in this area otherwise employees will lack
administered in this area otherwise employees will lackmotivation.
motivation.Hertzberg (2001) came up with a two factor model to
Hertzberg (2001) came up with a two factor model toillustrate the importance of performance motivation as
illustrate the importance of performance motivation aspart of best practice strategy. He asserted that
part of best practice strategy. He asserted thatfactors causing job satisfaction were quite different
factors causing job satisfaction were quite differentfrom those ones causing job dissatisfaction. He places
from those ones causing job dissatisfaction. He placesmore emphasis on factors that cause job satisfaction
more emphasis on factors that cause job satisfactionsuch as the nature of work, responsibilities in the
such as the nature of work, responsibilities in theworkplace and recognition of achievement. This is
workplace and recognition of achievement. This issomething that is quite different from simply increasing
something that is quite different from simply increasingsalaries. Pay can be considered as a factor that can
salaries. Pay can be considered as a factor that cancause job dissatisfaction and should be dealt with so
cause job dissatisfaction and should be dealt with soas to have time to concentrate on other important
as to have time to concentrate on other importantaspects. This is the reason why John Lewis does not
aspects. This is the reason why John Lewis does notsimply increase employees' salaries. It appreciates
simply increase employees' salaries. It appreciatesachievement and places more emphasis on the latter
achievement and places more emphasis on the latterrather than the former. This is the reason why its best
rather than the former. This is the reason why its bestpractice strategies have added value to the company.
practice strategies have added value to the company.John Lewis realised that payments simply alter
John Lewis realised that payments simply alterbehaviour but do not change the attitudes causing
behaviour but do not change the attitudes causingthese behaviours as stated by Kohn (1993).
these behaviours as stated by Kohn (1993).Kohn (1993) and Pfeffer (1998) solidify this stand point
Kohn (1993) and Pfeffer (1998) solidify this stand pointby adding that the financial aspect is not the only thing
by adding that the financial aspect is not the only thingthat matters. This is because the absence of it could
that matters. This is because the absence of it couldbe taken as a form of punishment by the organisation.
be taken as a form of punishment by the organisation.This is the reason why John Lewis uses its aspect of
This is the reason why John Lewis uses its aspect ofpartnership to motivate employees rather than just
partnership to motivate employees rather than justfocusing on financial issues. These same authors
focusing on financial issues. These same authorsassert that if a company only focuses on this type of
assert that if a company only focuses on this type ofapproach, it may prevent employees from tapping their
approach, it may prevent employees from tapping theirfull potential. John Lewis realised this and this is why
full potential. John Lewis realised this and this is whythe partnership adds other factors into the equation.
the partnership adds other factors into the equation.For example, employees within the organisation have
For example, employees within the organisation havethe power to hire or fire leaders within their council
the power to hire or fire leaders within their councilupon giving justification of their reasons for doing so.
upon giving justification of their reasons for doing so.Employees in the Company also have the freedom to
Employees in the Company also have the freedom toair out their grievances and misgivings about some of
air out their grievances and misgivings about some oftheir administrators. Such approaches move away
their administrators. Such approaches move awayform the financial aspect of motivation and
form the financial aspect of motivation andconsequently add value to the firm.
consequently add value to the firm.Kohn (1993) adds that it is possible to motivate
Kohn (1993) adds that it is possible to motivateemployees without the need to increase their pay. He
employees without the need to increase their pay. Heclaims there are three C's that employees can add to
claims there are three C's that employees can add totheir organisation in order to add value. These include
their organisation in order to add value. These includeChoice; where an employee should be given the
Choice; where an employee should be given theopportunity to participate in decisions affecting the
opportunity to participate in decisions affecting thecompany. This is an aspect that John Lewis has
company. This is an aspect that John Lewis hasperfected through voting power granted to its
perfected through voting power granted to itsemployees. Also, that they have an internal magazine
employees. Also, that they have an internal magazinewhere suggestions on governance are given and the
where suggestions on governance are given and theadministration reciprocates.  The second C is the
administration reciprocates.  The second C is theissue of Collaboration. Here there should be a
issue of Collaboration. Here there should be atwo-way exchange of information between the
two-way exchange of information between thecompany and the employees. The third C put forward
company and the employees. The third C put forwardby the same author is Content where organisations
by the same author is Content where organisationsshould go out of out their way to enrich employees'
should go out of out their way to enrich employees'jobs. This is an aspect that John Lewis has also
jobs. This is an aspect that John Lewis has alsoincorporated into their management style since
incorporated into their management style sinceemployees work in teams, line managers have
employees work in teams, line managers haveconsiderable amounts of responsibility and yet there
considerable amounts of responsibility and yet thereare always new technical issues faced John Lewis. All
are always new technical issues faced John Lewis. Allthese qualities deal with the content aspect of
these qualities deal with the content aspect ofmotivation thus adding value top the company.
motivation thus adding value top the company.Pfeffer (1998) asserts that employees can add value
Pfeffer (1998) asserts that employees can add valueto an organisation when there is equity within the
to an organisation when there is equity within theorganisation. Any given company should realise that an
organisation. Any given company should realise that anemployee will only be motivated when they receive
employee will only be motivated when they receiveappreciation for their efforts. This appreciation should
appreciation for their efforts. This appreciation shouldbe equal among all members of the organisation. Most
be equal among all members of the organisation. Mostorganisations have made the mistake of sharing profits
organisations have made the mistake of sharing profitsamong managers and top administrators yet this is
among managers and top administrators yet this isquite a big misconception. All members of the
quite a big misconception. All members of theorganisation should receive equal treatment in this area
organisation should receive equal treatment in this areabecause it will be a justifiable issue. Al members within
because it will be a justifiable issue. Al members withinthe organisation will feel just as importance as the he
the organisation will feel just as importance as the heother and it will strengthen the bond within the
other and it will strengthen the bond within theorganisation. John Lewis has recognised this truth. It
organisation. John Lewis has recognised this truth. Ithas given a lot of emphasis on equality. In the year
has given a lot of emphasis on equality. In the year2007, the Company distributed fifty five million pounds
2007, the Company distributed fifty five million poundsfairly and equally among all members of staff.
fairly and equally among all members of staff.Relationship between Human Resource and
Relationship between Human Resource anddevelopment activities and the strategic imperatives
development activities and the strategic imperativesfacing the company
facing the companyOne of the most crucial aspects of human resource
One of the most crucial aspects of human resourceand development activities within the organization
and development activities within the organizationunder study is reward systems. Reward systems
under study is reward systems. Reward systemshave a direct and fundamental link between strategic
have a direct and fundamental link between strategicimperatives facing the Company and overall
imperatives facing the Company and overalleffectiveness achieved by the company. This is
effectiveness achieved by the company. This isbecause pay systems can be modified so as to align
because pay systems can be modified so as to alignthemselves with overall goals and objectives of the
themselves with overall goals and objectives of theorganisation consequently becoming part of the
organisation consequently becoming part of thebusinesses strategy within the organisation. It is
businesses strategy within the organisation. It isimportant for companies to have business strategies
important for companies to have business strategiesfirst. This is because business strategies provide a
first. This is because business strategies provide aguideline that will help a given organisation have a
guideline that will help a given organisation have asense of direction. Business strategy defines the way
sense of direction. Business strategy defines the waythe firm will operate and what level of performance
the firm will operate and what level of performanceshould be expected. Therefore, business strategy is
should be expected. Therefore, business strategy isthe foundation for rewards systems within the best
the foundation for rewards systems within the bestpractice model.
practice model.The best practice model is such that reward systems
The best practice model is such that reward systemsshould encourage involvement by employees. This
should encourage involvement by employees. Thisimplies that the best practice model is against
implies that the best practice model is againstjob-based approaches where employees are paid
job-based approaches where employees are paidaccording to their merits. Instead, it advocates for pay
according to their merits. Instead, it advocates for paysystems that are based on skill and rewards and
systems that are based on skill and rewards andbonuses are given to employees when the company
bonuses are given to employees when the companyhas achieved success. Therefore the best practice
has achieved success. Therefore the best practicemodel moves away from the traditional methods of
model moves away from the traditional methods ofmeasuring employee performance through
measuring employee performance throughperformance appraisals. More focus is placed on
performance appraisals. More focus is placed oncreating a sense of concern within the employees
creating a sense of concern within the employeesabout the performance of the organisation. Also pay
about the performance of the organisation. Also paysystems are dependent on the nature of business
systems are dependent on the nature of businesssuccess mad not on the merits employees have.
success mad not on the merits employees have.Pfeffer (1998) points out some disadvantages of the
Pfeffer (1998) points out some disadvantages of thetraditional reward systems where merits were the
traditional reward systems where merits were themost important aspect at that time. These are;
most important aspect at that time. These are;- The merit system creates fear culture within the
- The merit system creates fear culture within theorganisation
organisation- employees mainly focus on short rather than long
- employees mainly focus on short rather than longterm goals
term goals- employees do not care about how the organisation
- employees do not care about how the organisationperforms
performs- it devalues team work because emphasis is on
- it devalues team work because emphasis is onindividual performance
individual performance- it is subject to biases and politics
- it is subject to biases and politicsIn light of these disadvantages, it became necessary
In light of these disadvantages, it became necessaryto adopt a reward system that addresses these
to adopt a reward system that addresses thesepitfalls. One should take note that best practice policies
pitfalls. One should take note that best practice policiesremain stagnant even when the organisation's strategic
remain stagnant even when the organisation's strategicdirection changes.
direction changes.Some of the theoretical frameworks contained in this
Some of the theoretical frameworks contained in thismodel were spearheaded by Huselid (1995) and
model were spearheaded by Huselid (1995) andPfeffer (1996). The best practice model is such that a
Pfeffer (1996). The best practice model is such that acompany that adopts this form of practice attract the
company that adopts this form of practice attract thebest human resource personnel there is out there. This
best human resource personnel there is out there. Thisimplies that the strategy the company adopted will be
implies that the strategy the company adopted will beinfluenced greatly by these valuable staff members
influenced greatly by these valuable staff membersand thus leading to organisational success. One can
and thus leading to organisational success. One cantherefore conclude that policies within this type of
therefore conclude that policies within this type ofstrategy precede business strategy.
strategy precede business strategy.The main relationship between best practice and an
The main relationship between best practice and anorganisation's strategic imperatives is that it provides a
organisation's strategic imperatives is that it provides abasis for achieving an organisation's pay objectives.
basis for achieving an organisation's pay objectives.Lawler (1996) states that an organisation first needs to
Lawler (1996) states that an organisation first needs toidentify its reward system objectives. This is because
identify its reward system objectives. This is becausethe objectives act as a basis for measuring the
the objectives act as a basis for measuring theeffectiveness of the pay systems and they also act
effectiveness of the pay systems and they also actas guidelines. Some of the objectives are;
as guidelines. Some of the objectives are;‘Objectives of reward systems
‘Objectives of reward systemsAttract and retain employees;
Attract and retain employees;Motivate performance;
Motivate performance;Promote skill and knowledge development;
Promote skill and knowledge development;Contribute to corporate culture;
Contribute to corporate culture;Reinforce and define structure; and
Reinforce and define structure; andDetermine pay costs' (Lawler, 1996)
Determine pay costs' (Lawler, 1996)These objectives have contributed greatly towards
These objectives have contributed greatly towardsachievement of John Lewis Strategic intent. These
achievement of John Lewis Strategic intent. Theseshall be examined in detail. The first link between the
shall be examined in detail. The first link between thelatter mentioned acts is attraction and retention of
latter mentioned acts is attraction and retention ofemployees. For the organisation under study; John
employees. For the organisation under study; JohnLewis, there is a need to attract best quality individuals
Lewis, there is a need to attract best quality individualsbecause the retail sector is highly competitive. This is
because the retail sector is highly competitive. This ishighly relevant since there are instances when labour
highly relevant since there are instances when labourmarkets become stringent. Pfeffer (1998) suggests
markets become stringent. Pfeffer (1998) suggeststhat there is a link between what amount a firm pays
that there is a link between what amount a firm paysto its workforce and the quality of employees it is able
to its workforce and the quality of employees it is ableto attract. This theory is seen clearly in the John Lewis
to attract. This theory is seen clearly in the John Lewispartnership where the company paid millions in
partnership where the company paid millions inbonuses to its workforce. This caused an increase in
bonuses to its workforce. This caused an increase inthe company's performance as seen from its
the company's performance as seen from itsfavourable market shares.
favourable market shares.Huselid (1995) adds that attracting the right employees
Huselid (1995) adds that attracting the right employeesis not just something that is achieved by a pay system.
is not just something that is achieved by a pay system.It is also something that needs to be combined with a
It is also something that needs to be combined with ameticulous selection process. The organisation needs
meticulous selection process. The organisation needsto ensure that thee are well qualified candidates in
to ensure that thee are well qualified candidates inlarge numbers. the importance of the selection process
large numbers. the importance of the selection processis that a candidate may feel honoured to belong to an
is that a candidate may feel honoured to belong to anorganisation that takes its selection process seriously.
organisation that takes its selection process seriously.This can be carried further to imply that the
This can be carried further to imply that theorganisation also values people and this means that
organisation also values people and this means thatthose employees will feel privileged to belong to the
those employees will feel privileged to belong to theorganisation. This is exactly what has occurred at John
organisation. This is exactly what has occurred at JohnLewis Company.
Lewis Company.Delery and Doty (1996) assert that whenever there is
Delery and Doty (1996) assert that whenever there isa low employee turnover, employees will feel more
a low employee turnover, employees will feel moreobliged to perform because they are assured of their
obliged to perform because they are assured of theirjob security. They highlight the importance of knowing
job security. They highlight the importance of knowingthat one will not loose their job. This is because it will.
that one will not loose their job. This is because it will.prevent them from worrying about this and instead
prevent them from worrying about this and insteadfocus on tasks at hand. Pfeffer (1994) goes on to add
focus on tasks at hand. Pfeffer (1994) goes on to addthat low employee turnover is quite necessary when
that low employee turnover is quite necessary whentrying to create a family friendly culture within an
trying to create a family friendly culture within anorganisation. This means that workers will feel at home
organisation. This means that workers will feel at homein their work environment. They will also be challenged
in their work environment. They will also be challengedintellectually and consequently enjoy their work
intellectually and consequently enjoy their workexperience. This is also toped up by a good reward
experience. This is also toped up by a good rewardsystem. John Lewis is characterised by such practices
system. John Lewis is characterised by such practicessince it has a rigorous selection process, high
since it has a rigorous selection process, highemployee retention and a strong organisational culture.
employee retention and a strong organisational culture.Contribution Human resource and development can
Contribution Human resource and development canmake towards achieving the organisation's strategic
make towards achieving the organisation's strategicintent
intentBest practice as a human resource development
Best practice as a human resource developmentstrategy can help an organisation achieve its strategic
strategy can help an organisation achieve its strategicintent through creation of a unique corporate culture.
intent through creation of a unique corporate culture.Drennan (1992) describes corporate culture as the
Drennan (1992) describes corporate culture as theway things are done within any organisation. It can
way things are done within any organisation. It caneither impede or promote organisational effectiveness
either impede or promote organisational effectivenessdepending on its implementation.
depending on its implementation.John Lewis partnership should ensure that it promotes
John Lewis partnership should ensure that it promotesorganisational effectiveness through the following
organisational effectiveness through the followingways. It should try as much as possible to reinforce its
ways. It should try as much as possible to reinforce itsvalue in areas such as innovation, quality, performance
value in areas such as innovation, quality, performanceand teamwork as suggested by Armstrong (1999).
and teamwork as suggested by Armstrong (1999).Lawler (1996) adds that an organisation can create a
Lawler (1996) adds that an organisation can create aculture through best practise approaches by
culture through best practise approaches byencouraging the following;
encouraging the following;-participation
-participation-innovation
-innovation-entrepreneurship
-entrepreneurship-eliminating too much bureaucracy
-eliminating too much bureaucracy-encouraging competency
-encouraging competency 
Lawler (1996) goes on to add that organisations shouldLawler (1996) goes on to add that organisations should
deal with two aspects in order to change theirdeal with two aspects in order to change their
corporate culture and to achieve their strategic intent.corporate culture and to achieve their strategic intent.
This can be done through communication and theThis can be done through communication and the
decision making process. John Lewis should make suredecision making process. John Lewis should make sure
that it continues to maintain open and transparentthat it continues to maintain open and transparent
channels of communication about its reward systems.channels of communication about its reward systems.
This will eliminate any uncertainties among members ofThis will eliminate any uncertainties among members of
staff and will contribute towards their commitment. Thestaff and will contribute towards their commitment. The
Company should also go out of its way to maintain aCompany should also go out of its way to maintain a
participative approach in decision making. Lawler (1995)participative approach in decision making. Lawler (1995)
notes that companies that have failed in the past arenotes that companies that have failed in the past are
those ones that adopted autocratic methods ofthose ones that adopted autocratic methods of
governance; these are characterised by secrecy andgovernance; these are characterised by secrecy and
top down communications. The Company should sticktop down communications. The Company should stick
to these best practice principles in order to achieveto these best practice principles in order to achieve
their strategic intent.their strategic intent.
Conclusion 
Best practise is a human resource strategy thatConclusion
affects overall organisational strategy. According toBest practise is a human resource strategy that
the best practice approach, reward systemsaffects overall organisational strategy. According to
contribute to organisational culture. However, paythe best practice approach, reward systems
should not be the only thing that takes precedence.contribute to organisational culture. However, pay
There should be adequate consideration of decisionshould not be the only thing that takes precedence.
making powers, communication channels and jobThere should be adequate consideration of decision
enrichment. If these latter three factors aremaking powers, communication channels and job
implemented by companies, then they will achieveenrichment. If these latter three factors are
competitive advantage. The John Lewis has been onimplemented by companies, then they will achieve
the frontline of best practise strategies because it is acompetitive advantage. The John Lewis has been on
worker and most of their decisions are participative.the frontline of best practise strategies because it is a
Reward systems within this company encourageworker and most of their decisions are participative.
equity and this is why it has been recorded increasedReward systems within this company encourage
profits in the recent years.equity and this is why it has been recorded increased
Reference:profits in the recent years.
John Lewis (2007): Interim Financial report. RetrievedReference:
24 March, 2008John Lewis (2007): Interim Financial report. Retrieved
Pfeffer, J. and Velga, J. (1999): Putting people first for24 March, 2008
organizational success;Pfeffer, J. and Velga, J. (1999): Putting people first for
Academy of Management Executive, 13 (2), p. 37-48organizational success;
Youndt, M. A. et al (1996): Human ResourceAcademy of Management Executive, 13 (2), p. 37-48
Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and FirmYoundt, M. A. et al (1996): Human Resource
Performance; Academy of Management Journal, 39,Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm
p836-66Performance; Academy of Management Journal, 39,
Pfeffer, J. (1998): Six Dangerous Myths About Pay;p836-66
Harvard Business Review, May-Pfeffer, J. (1998): Six Dangerous Myths About Pay;
June, p. 109-119Harvard Business Review, May-
Pfeffer, J. (1994): Competitive Advantage ThroughJune, p. 109-119
People: Unleashing the Power ofthe Workforce,Pfeffer, J. (1994): Competitive Advantage Through
Boston, MA: Stanford Graduate School of Business;People: Unleashing the Power ofthe Workforce,
Harvard BusinessBoston, MA: Stanford Graduate School of Business;
School PressHarvard Business
Burnes, B. (2000): Managing Change: A StrategicSchool Press
Approach to OrganisationalBurnes, B. (2000): Managing Change: A Strategic
Dynamcis, Harlow: Financial Times; Prentice HallApproach to Organisational
Adams, J. (1965): Inequity in Social Exchange. InDynamcis, Harlow: Financial Times; Prentice Hall
Advances in Experimental SocialAdams, J. (1965): Inequity in Social Exchange. In
Psychology, vol. 2, ed. L. Berkowitz, p. 267-299; NewAdvances in Experimental Social
York: Academic Press.Psychology, vol. 2, ed. L. Berkowitz, p. 267-299; New
Herzberg, F. (2001): One More Time: How Do YouYork: Academic Press.
Motivate Employees? HarvardHerzberg, F. (2001): One More Time: How Do You
Business Review, 81(3), p. 87-96Motivate Employees? Harvard
Huselid, M. (1995): The Impact of Human ResourceBusiness Review, 81(3), p. 87-96
Management Practices onHuselid, M. (1995): The Impact of Human Resource
Turnover, Productivity and Corporate FinancialManagement Practices on
Performance; Academy ofTurnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial
Management Journal, 38 (3), p. 635-72Performance; Academy of
Kohn, A. (1993): Rethinking Rewards; Harvard BusinessManagement Journal, 38 (3), p. 635-72
Review, 71(6), p. 48-49.Kohn, A. (1993): Rethinking Rewards; Harvard Business
Lawler, E. (1996): The Design of Effective RewardReview, 71(6), p. 48-49.
Systems. In Motivation andLawler, E. (1996): The Design of Effective Reward
Leadership at Work, sixth edition, eds. R. Steers, L.Systems. In Motivation and
Porter and G.Bigley, p. 527-550.Leadership at Work, sixth edition, eds. R. Steers, L.
New York; McGraw Hill International PressPorter and G.Bigley, p. 527-550.
Delery, J. and Doty, D. (1996): Models of Theorizing inNew York; McGraw Hill International Press
Strategic Human ResourceDelery, J. and Doty, D. (1996): Models of Theorizing in
Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency andStrategic Human Resource
Configurational PerformanceManagement: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency and
Predictions; Academy of Management Journal, 39(4),Configurational Performance
p802-35Predictions; Academy of Management Journal, 39(4),
Armstrong, M. (1999): Employee Reward. 2ndedition.p802-35
London: CIPDArmstrong, M. (1999): Employee Reward. 2ndedition.
Lawler, E. (1995): The New Pay: A Strategic Approach;London: CIPD
Compensation and BenefitsLawler, E. (1995): The New Pay: A Strategic Approach;
Review, 27 (4), p.14-22Compensation and Benefits
IntroductionReview, 27 (4), p.