Best Practice

lass="article_content">should encourage involvement by employees. This
Introductionimplies that the best practice model is against
Best practice as a human resource and developmentjob-based approaches where employees are paid
strategy attempts to link two issues i.e. humanaccording to their merits. Instead, it advocates for pay
resource strategies and competitive advantage. Thissystems that are based on skill and rewards and
perspective is founded on the belief that humanbonuses are given to employees when the company
resource and development strategies can causehas achieved success. Therefore the best practice
employees to become committed and highly motivatedmodel moves away from the traditional methods of
towards their organisation. Consequently, suchmeasuring employee performance through
employees are expected to contribute towardsperformance appraisals. More focus is placed on
improvement of the company’s performance.creating a sense of concern within the employees
Reward systems form a critical part of best practiceabout the performance of the organisation. Also pay
policy because they still fall under human resourcesystems are dependent on the nature of business
strategies.success mad not on the merits employees have.
The organisation to be examined is John LewisPfeffer (1998) points out some disadvantages of the
Partnership. This company is a worker co-op. It is onetraditional reward systems where merits were the
of the most exemplary companies when it comes tomost important aspect at that time. These are;
implementation of best practice strategies. This is- The merit system creates fear culture within the
because all the employees within the organisation areorganisation
part owners of the organisation. The organisation- employees mainly focus on short rather than long
focuses on addressing all their needs whether in theterm goals
reward section or elsewhere. On the other hand, the- employees do not care about how the organisation
employees pay back these efforts throughperforms
commitment and best performance. Best practice has- it devalues team work because emphasis is on
formed one of the organisation’s key strengths.individual performance
Strategic capability and degree of sophistication of the- it is subject to biases and politics
strategic Human resource and development effortIn light of these disadvantages, it became necessary
John Lewis partnership has made sure that training isto adopt a reward system that addresses these
part of its human resource and development efforts.pitfalls. One should take note that best practice policies
This is because it realises the value of this bestremain stagnant even when the organisation’s
practice strategy. Pfeffer and Velga (1999) explain thestrategic direction changes.
importance of training and development of skills withinSome of the theoretical frameworks contained in this
any organisation. A company that takes its employeesmodel were spearheaded by Huselid (1995) and
through training solidifies their contribution to thePfeffer (1996). The best practice model is such that a
company. This is because such employees getcompany that adopts this form of practice attract the
equipped with the ability to make decisions in theirbest human resource personnel there is out there. This
work. On top of this, such employees have high levelsimplies that the strategy the company adopted will be
of initiative and will try their utmost best to improveinfluenced greatly by these valuable staff members
their organisational contribution. Skill development is aand thus leading to organisational success. One can
characteristic part of the John Lewis Partnershiptherefore conclude that policies within this type of
because employees who feel the need to improvestrategy precede business strategy.
their skills are given opportunities to do so throughThe main relationship between best practice and an
training schemes.organisation’s strategic imperatives is that it
Youndt et al (1996) emphasise that training is one ofprovides a basis for achieving an organisation’s
the most fundamental aspects of best practicepay objectives. Lawler (1996) states that an
models. However, these same authors also add thatorganisation first needs to identify its reward system
training should be integrated into other developmentobjectives. This is because the objectives act as a
activities like staffing, job rotation and others. Theybasis for measuring the effectiveness of the pay
claim that no amount of training will contribute towardssystems and they also act as guidelines. Some of the
organisational development if employees are notobjectives are;
granted the permission to practice those acquired skills.‘Objectives of reward systems
This means that an organisation should try its best toAttract and retain employees;
grant work autonomy to its employees and toMotivate performance;
empower them through training. John Lewis hasPromote skill and knowledge development;
achieved this very well. In other retail companies, lineContribute to corporate culture;
managers are given minimal responsibilities. Most ofReinforce and define structure; and
them are expected to consult with higher authorities inDetermine pay costs’ (Lawler, 1996)
order to decide on issues. However, the companyThese objectives have contributed greatly towards
under study has eliminated that problem by trainingachievement of John Lewis Strategic intent. These
those members of staff (so that they can haveshall be examined in detail. The first link between the
necessary skills) and then allowing them to makelatter mentioned acts is attraction and retention of
independent decisions. They believe that this is a formemployees. For the organisation under study; John
of investment into human capital since most of theseLewis, there is a need to attract best quality individuals
employees feel valued.because the retail sector is highly competitive. This is
According to the Classical and Human relationshighly relevant since there are instances when labour
approach, an organisation’s structure andmarkets become stringent. Pfeffer (1998) suggests
operation are affected by certain situational factorsthat there is a link between what amount a firm pays
such as technology, size and environment. Howeverto its workforce and the quality of employees it is able
best practice advocates like Burnes (2000) came upto attract. This theory is seen clearly in the John Lewis
with a contingency theory. He believes that a rewardpartnership where the company paid millions in
system within any company can affect the way itbonuses to its workforce. This caused an increase in
operates or how it is structured. Pfeffer (1994)the company’s performance as seen from its
believes that best practice companies should have afavourable market shares.
structure that places staff members into groups.Huselid (1995) adds that attracting the right employees
Those groups should be such that they have the abilityis not just something that is achieved by a pay system.
to make their own decisions. Another aspect of bestIt is also something that needs to be combined with a
practise firms is that they ought to have rewardmeticulous selection process. The organisation needs
systems that are compact in nature. This implies thatto ensure that thee are well qualified candidates in
there should be minimal differences between differentlarge numbers. the importance of the selection process
members of staff so that most employees within theis that a candidate may feel honoured to belong to an
organisation operate in a relatively independent mannerorganisation that takes its selection process seriously.
with the ability to make their own decisions. JohnThis can be carried further to imply that the
Lewis’ strategic capability in this aspect oforganisation also values people and this means that
structure is demonstrated by the division of thethose employees will feel privileged to belong to the
company into departments. These departments workorganisation. This is exactly what has occurred at John
together to achieve gaols and have been grantedLewis Company.
relative autonomy. One can consider them as teams.Delery and Doty (1996) assert that whenever there is
Also, the company gives almost equal rewards to alla low employee turnover, employees will feel more
members of the teams. One can therefore concludeobliged to perform because they are assured of their
that the company’s structure is a clear depictionjob security. They highlight the importance of knowing
of its best practise strategy. (Pfeffer, 1994)that one will not loose their job. This is because it will.
Why and whether human resource strategy is seenprevent them from worrying about this and instead
as adding valuefocus on tasks at hand. Pfeffer (1994) goes on to add
Best practice strategies have definitely added value tothat low employee turnover is quite necessary when
the organisation. This is because the approach hastrying to create a family friendly culture within an
motivated performance within the organisation.organisation. This means that workers will feel at home
According to the Equity and expectancy theoriesin their work environment. They will also be challenged
(main components of the best practice model) putintellectually and consequently enjoy their work
forward by Adam (1965). It can be seen that there areexperience. This is also toped up by a good reward
two aspects in motivation. The first is the input madesystem. John Lewis is characterised by such practices
by an employee and the second is outcome whichsince it has a rigorous selection process, high
normally comes from the respective organisation. Theemployee retention and a strong organisational culture.
ratio between these two aspects needs to be equalContribution Human resource and development can
otherwise employees will loose motivation to perform.make towards achieving the organisation’s
This is where the term negative inequity stems from.strategic intent
Here, an employee’s input is not matched toBest practice as a human resource development
outcome from the organisation. There is a need forstrategy can help an organisation achieve its strategic
justice to be administered in this area otherwiseintent through creation of a unique corporate culture.
employees will lack motivation.Drennan (1992) describes corporate culture as the
Hertzberg (2001) came up with a two factor model toway things are done within any organisation. It can
illustrate the importance of performance motivation aseither impede or promote organisational effectiveness
part of best practice strategy. He asserted thatdepending on its implementation.
factors causing job satisfaction were quite differentJohn Lewis partnership should ensure that it promotes
from those ones causing job dissatisfaction. He placesorganisational effectiveness through the following
more emphasis on factors that cause job satisfactionways. It should try as much as possible to reinforce its
such as the nature of work, responsibilities in thevalue in areas such as innovation, quality, performance
workplace and recognition of achievement. This isand teamwork as suggested by Armstrong (1999).
something that is quite different from simply increasingLawler (1996) adds that an organisation can create a
salaries. Pay can be considered as a factor that canculture through best practise approaches by
cause job dissatisfaction and should be dealt with soencouraging the following;
as to have time to concentrate on other important-participation
aspects. This is the reason why John Lewis does not-innovation
simply increase employees’ salaries. It-entrepreneurship
appreciates achievement and places more emphasis-eliminating too much bureaucracy
on the latter rather than the former. This is the reason-encouraging competency
why its best practice strategies have added value toLawler (1996) goes on to add that organisations should
the company. John Lewis realised that paymentsdeal with two aspects in order to change their
simply alter behaviour but do not change the attitudescorporate culture and to achieve their strategic intent.
causing these behaviours as stated by Kohn (1993).This can be done through communication and the
Kohn (1993) and Pfeffer (1998) solidify this stand pointdecision making process. John Lewis should make sure
by adding that the financial aspect is not the only thingthat it continues to maintain open and transparent
that matters. This is because the absence of it couldchannels of communication about its reward systems.
be taken as a form of punishment by the organisation.This will eliminate any uncertainties among members of
This is the reason why John Lewis uses its aspect ofstaff and will contribute towards their commitment. The
partnership to motivate employees rather than justCompany should also go out of its way to maintain a
focusing on financial issues. These same authorsparticipative approach in decision making. Lawler (1995)
assert that if a company only focuses on this type ofnotes that companies that have failed in the past are
approach, it may prevent employees from tapping theirthose ones that adopted autocratic methods of
full potential. John Lewis realised this and this is whygovernance; these are characterised by secrecy and
the partnership adds other factors into the equation.top down communications. The Company should stick
For example, employees within the organisation haveto these best practice principles in order to achieve
the power to hire or fire leaders within their counciltheir strategic intent.
upon giving justification of their reasons for doing so.Conclusion
Employees in the Company also have the freedom toBest practise is a human resource strategy that
air out their grievances and misgivings about some ofaffects overall organisational strategy. According to
their administrators. Such approaches move awaythe best practice approach, reward systems
form the financial aspect of motivation andcontribute to organisational culture. However, pay
consequently add value to the firm.should not be the only thing that takes precedence.
Kohn (1993) adds that it is possible to motivateThere should be adequate consideration of decision
employees without the need to increase their pay. Hemaking powers, communication channels and job
claims there are three C’s that employees canenrichment. If these latter three factors are
add to their organisation in order to add value. Theseimplemented by companies, then they will achieve
include Choice; where an employee should be givencompetitive advantage. The John Lewis has been on
the opportunity to participate in decisions affecting thethe frontline of best practise strategies because it is a
company. This is an aspect that John Lewis hasworker and most of their decisions are participative.
perfected through voting power granted to itsReward systems within this company encourage
employees. Also, that they have an internal magazineequity and this is why it has been recorded increased
where suggestions on governance are given and theprofits in the recent years.
administration reciprocates. The second C is the issueReference:
of Collaboration. Here there should be a two-wayJohn Lewis (2007): Interim Financial report. Retrieved
exchange of information between the company and24 March, 2008 from:
the employees. The third C put forward by the samePfeffer, J. and Velga, J. (1999): Putting people first for
author is Content where organisations should go out oforganizational success;
out their way to enrich employees’ jobs. This isAcademy of Management Executive, 13 (2), p. 37-48
an aspect that John Lewis has also incorporated intoYoundt, M. A. et al (1996): Human Resource
their management style since employees work inManagement, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm
teams, line managers have considerable amounts ofPerformance; Academy of Management Journal, 39,
responsibility and yet there are always new technicalp836-66
issues faced John Lewis. All these qualities deal withPfeffer, J. (1998): Six Dangerous Myths About Pay;
the content aspect of motivation thus adding value topHarvard Business Review, May-
the company.June, p. 109-119
Pfeffer (1998) asserts that employees can add valuePfeffer, J. (1994): Competitive Advantage Through
to an organisation when there is equity within thePeople: Unleashing the Power ofthe Workforce,
organisation. Any given company should realise that anBoston, MA: Stanford Graduate School of Business;
employee will only be motivated when they receiveHarvard Business
appreciation for their efforts. This appreciation shouldSchool Press
be equal among all members of the organisation. MostBurnes, B. (2000): Managing Change: A Strategic
organisations have made the mistake of sharing profitsApproach to Organisational
among managers and top administrators yet this isDynamcis, Harlow: Financial Times; Prentice Hall
quite a big misconception. All members of theAdams, J. (1965): Inequity in Social Exchange. In
organisation should receive equal treatment in this areaAdvances in Experimental Social
because it will be a justifiable issue. Al members withinPsychology, vol. 2, ed. L. Berkowitz, p. 267-299; New
the organisation will feel just as importance as the heYork: Academic Press.
other and it will strengthen the bond within theHerzberg, F. (2001): One More Time: How Do You
organisation. John Lewis has recognised this truth. ItMotivate Employees? Harvard
has given a lot of emphasis on equality. In the yearBusiness Review, 81(3), p. 87-96
2007, the Company distributed fifty five million poundsHuselid, M. (1995): The Impact of Human Resource
fairly and equally among all members of staff.Management Practices on
Relationship between Human Resource andTurnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial
development activities and the strategic imperativesPerformance; Academy of
facing the companyManagement Journal, 38 (3), p. 635-72
One of the most crucial aspects of human resourceKohn, A. (1993): Rethinking Rewards; Harvard Business
and development activities within the organizationReview, 71(6), p. 48-49.
under study is reward systems. Reward systemsLawler, E. (1996): The Design of Effective Reward
have a direct and fundamental link between strategicSystems. In Motivation and
imperatives facing the Company and overallLeadership at Work, sixth edition, eds. R. Steers, L.
effectiveness achieved by the company. This isPorter and G.Bigley, p. 527-550.
because pay systems can be modified so as to alignNew York; McGraw Hill International Press
themselves with overall goals and objectives of theDelery, J. and Doty, D. (1996): Models of Theorizing in
organisation consequently becoming part of theStrategic Human Resource
businesses strategy within the organisation. It isManagement: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency and
important for companies to have business strategiesConfigurational Performance
first. This is because business strategies provide aPredictions; Academy of Management Journal, 39(4),
guideline that will help a given organisation have ap802-35
sense of direction. Business strategy defines the wayArmstrong, M. (1999): Employee Reward. 2ndedition.
the firm will operate and what level of performanceLondon: CIPD
should be expected. Therefore, business strategy isLawler, E. (1995): The New Pay: A Strategic Approach;
the foundation for rewards systems within the bestCompensation and Benefits
practice model.Review, 27 (4), p.
The best practice model is such that reward systems