Welcome to your ultimate human resource management information!
 

Welcome to our Human Resource Management Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

Article #1: What is human resource management?

(Browse for more articles)

 
Human Resource Management (HRM) is both natural capital.
an academic theory and a business The debate regarding "human resources"
practice. It is based on the notion that versus human capital thus in many ways
employees are firstly human, and secondly echoes the debate regarding natural
should NOT be treated as a basic business resources versus natural capital. Over
resource. HRM is also seen as an time the United Nations have come to more
understanding of the human aspect of a generally support the developing nations'
company and its strategic importance. HRM point of view, and have requested
is seen as moving on from a simple significant offsetting "foreign aid"
"personnel" approach (or was supposed to) contributions so that a developing nation
because it is preventative of potential losing human capital does not lose the
problems, and secondly it should be a capacity to continue to train new people
major aspect of the company philosophy, in trades, professions, and the arts.
in which all managers and employees are An extreme version of this view is that
champions of HRM-based policies and historical inequities such as African
philosophy. slavery must be compensated by current
Human resources has at least two meanings developed nations, which benefitted from
depending on context. The original usage stolen "human resources" as they were
derives from political economy and developing. This is an extremely
economics, where it was traditionally controversial view, but it echoes the
called labor, one of three factors of general theme of converting human capital
production. The more common usage within to "human resources" and thus greatly
corporations and businesses refers to the diminishing its value to the host
individuals within the firm, and to the society, i.e. "Africa", as it is put to
portion of the firm's organization that narrow imitative use as "labor" in the
deals with hiring, firing, training, and using society.
other personnel issues. This article will In the very narrow context of corporate
address both definitions. "human resources", there is a contrasting
Modern analysis emphasizes that human pull to reflect and require workplace
beings are not predictable commodity diversity that echoes the diversity of a
"resources" with definitions totally global customer base. Foreign language
controlled by contract, but are creative and culture skills, ingenuity, humor, and
and social beings that make contributions careful listening, are examples of traits
beyond "labor" to a society and to that such programs typically require. It
civilization. The broad term human would appear that these evidence a
capital has evolved to contain the general shift to the human capital point
complexity of this term, and in of view, and an acknowledgement that
macro-economics the term "firm-specific human beings do contribute much more to a
human capital" has evolved to represent productive enterprise than "work": they
the original meaning of term "human bring their character, their ethics,
resources". their creativity, their social
Advocating the central role of "human connections, and in some cases even their
resources" or human capital in pets and children, and alter the
enterprises and societies has been a character of a workplace. The term
traditional role of socialist parties, corporate culture is used to characterize
who claim that value is primarily created such processes.
by their activity, and accordingly The traditional but extremely narrow
justify a larger claim of profits or context of hiring, firing, and job
relief from these enterprises or description is considered a 20th century
societies. Critics say this is just a anachronism. Most corporate organizations
bargaining tactic which grew out of that compete in the modern global economy
various practices of medieval European have adopted a view of human capital that
guilds into the modern trade union and mirrors the modern consensus as above.
collective bargaining unit. Some of these, in turn, deprecate the
A contrary view, common to capitalist term "human resources" as useless.
parties, is that it is the As the term refers to predictable
infrastructural capital and (what they exploitations of human capital in one
call) intellectual capital owned and context or another, it can still be said
fused by "management" that provides most to apply to manual labor, mass
value in financial capital terms. This agriculture, low skill "McJobs" in
likewise justifies a bargaining position service industries, military and other
and a general view that "human resources" work that has clear job descriptions, and
are interchangeable. The unicist approach which generally do not encourage creative
defines the integration of humans and or social contributions.
business as a sole unified field. In general the abstractions of
A significant sign of consensus on this macro-economics treat it this way - as it
latter point is the ISO 9000 series of characterizes no mechanisms to represent
standards which requires a "job choice or ingenuity. So one
description" of every participant in a interpretation is that "firm-specific
productive enterprise. In general, human capital" as defined in
heavily unionized nations such as France macro-economics is the modern and correct
and Germany have adopted and encouraged definition of "human resources" - and
such descriptions especially within trade that this is inadequate to represent the
unions. One view of this trend is that a contributions of "human resources" in any
strong social consensus on political modern theory of political economy.
economy and a good social welfare system Though human resources have been part of
facilitates labor mobility and tends to business and organizations since the
make the entire economy more productive, first days of agriculture, the modern
as labor can move from one enterprise to concept of human resources began in
another with little controversy or reaction to the efficiency focus of
difficulty in adapting. Taylorism in the early 1900s. By 1920,
An important controversy regarding labor psychologists and employment experts in
mobility illustrates the broader the United States started the human
philosophical issue with usage of the relations movement, which viewed workers
phrase "human resources": governments of in terms of their psychology and fit with
developing nations often regard developed companies, rather than as interchangeable
nations that encourage immigration or parts. This movement grew throughout the
"guest workers" as appropriating human middle of the 20th century, placing
capital that is rightfully part of the emphasis on how leadership, cohesion, and
developing nation and required to further loyalty played important roles in
its growth as a civilization. They argue organizational success. Although this
that this appropriation is similar to view was increasingly challenged by more
colonial commodity fiat wherein a quantitatively rigorous and less "soft"
colonizing European power would define an management techniques in the 1960s and
arbitrary price for natural resources, beyond, human resources had gained a
extracting which diminished national permanent role within the firm.






1- A- B- C- D- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47- 48- 49-